Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation 2

January 21, 2023

Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation 2

Order Number	653547576458566
Type of Project	ESSAY/DISERTATION
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED
Format	APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD
Academic Sources	10 -20
Page Count	4-8 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation 2

You will use the: Graduate Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation TemplateDownload Graduate Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation Template Compose a written comprehensive psychiatric evaluation of a patient you have seen in the clinic. Your preceptor MUST sign their initials on the comprehensive psychiatric evaluation document to confirm they have reviewed and acknowledge this patient was seen in their clinic. You will then use Canvas Studio Screen Capture and Webcam (I want to see your face and your document at the same time) to record yourself presenting your completed comprehensive psychiatric evaluation document. Use ONLY Canvas Studio to record your comprehensive psychiatric evaluation and verbal presentation. No other medium will be accepted. How do I record a Canvas Studio video with a webcam in a course? Links to an external site. How do I create a video with a PowerPoint in Canvas Studio Screen Capture Links to an external site. Step 2: Each student will create a focused SOAP note PowerPoint presentation. SOAP is an acronym that stands for Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan. The comprehensive psychiatric SOAP note is to be written using the attached template below. S = Subjective data: Patient’s Chief Complaint (CC); History of the Present Illness (HPI)/ Demographics; History of the Present Illness (HPI) that includes the presenting problem and the 8 dimensions of the problem (OLDCARTS or PQRST); Review of Systems (ROS) O = Objective data: Medications; Allergies; Past medical history; Family psychiatric history; Past surgical history; Psychiatric history, Social history; Labs and screening tools; Vital signs; Physical exam, (Focused), and Mental Status Exam A = Assessment: Primary Diagnosis and two differential diagnoses including ICD-10 and DSM5 codes P = Plan: Pharmacologic and Non-pharmacologic treatment plan; diagnostic testing/screening tools, patient/family teaching, referral, and follow up Other: Incorporate current clinical guidelines NIH Clinical Guidelines Links to an external site.or APA Clinical Guidelines Links to an external site., research articles, and the role of the PMHNP in your presentation. Psychiatric Assessment of Infants and Toddlers Links to an external site. Psychiatric Assessment of Children and Adolescents Links to an external site. Reminder: It is important that you complete this assessment using your critical thinking skills. You are expected to synthesis your clinical assessment, formulate a psychiatric diagnosis, and develop a treatment plan independently. It is not acceptable to document “my preceptor made this diagnosis.” An example of the appropriate descriptors of the clinical evaluation is listed below. It is not acceptable to document “within normal limits.” Graduate Mental Status Exam Guide Download Graduate Mental Status Exam Guide Successfully Capture HPI Elements in Psychiatry E/M NotesLinks to an external site. AAPC Admin. (2013, August 1). Successfully capture HPI elements in psychiatry E/M notes. Advancing the Business of Healthcare. https://www.aapc.com/blog/25848-successfully-capture-hpi-elements-in-psychiatry-em-notes/

[Order Now]

Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation 2

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.