Comprehensive Investment Analysis on Companies Discussion

December 15, 2022

Comprehensive Investment Analysis on Companies Discussion

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Comprehensive Investment Analysis on Companies Discussion

Comprehensive, Investment, Analysis, Companies, Discussion

[Order Now]

Part 1: Overview of Company

Please review the Comprehensive Investment Analysis Overview to get familiarized with the project objective.

Section Objective

You are going to write a report to provide your readers with the most pertinent information that will enable them to get an overview of your company and its position within the industry before you analyze the financial performance of the company in Part 2.

Instructions

Research and then describe your company’s primary business activities. You need to address all the following topics:

Inform your readers how part 1 aligns with the project objective

A brief historical summary

A discussion of competitors including the reason for the choice of competitors (rather than just a list of competitors)

The company’s position within the industry

Recent developments within the company/industry

The key risk factors

The strategic direction of the company

Other items of significance to your corporation

Provide a brief summary of your findings in your conclusion and inform your readers of what your next steps are within the project objective.

In your report, utilize information from a variety of resources and select the most pertinent information. For example:

Start your research using the library’s research guide (Links to an external site.).

Consult the Form 10-K filed with the SEC database (Links to an external site.).

Review the Annual Report and especially the Letter to Shareholders and the risk factor statement

Explore the corporate website including the investor relations website

Select at least two significant news items from recent business periodicals.

Submit a written report that is 2-4 pages long. The report should be well written with introductory and concluding paragraphs. Include a complete bibliography. The format should be double-spaced, one-inch margins, using a 12-point Times New Roman font.

Turnitin

This course has Turnitin® fully integrated into the course drop box. This means that you should only submit your assignments to the drop box below. Please do not submit your assignment directly to Turnitin.com.

Once submitted, your assignment will be evaluated by Turnitin automatically. You will be able to view an Originality Report within minutes of your first submission that will show how much of your work has been identified as similar to other sources such as websites, textbooks, or other student papers.

Use your Originality Report as a learning tool to identify areas of your assignment that you may not have cited appropriately. You may resubmit your assignment through this drop box as many times as you need to check to see if you have made improvements, until the due date of the assignment.

However, once you have made your first submission, you will need to wait 24 hours after each subsequent submission to receive a new Originality Report. Plan accordingly as you draft your assignment. Once the due date has passed, your assignment submission will be considered final.

Evaluation

This assignment will be graded using the rubric located on the Course Rubrics page within the Start Here section of the course. Please review the rubric prior to beginning your work so that you ensure your submission meets the criteria in place for this assignment. The Case Study Project assignments, together, are worth 30% of your final course grade.

[Order Now]

Comprehensive Investment Analysis on Companies Discussion

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.