Compensation and Benefits Assignment

February 2, 2023

Compensation and Benefits Assignment

Order Number	653348756876896736
Type of Project	ESSAY/DISERTATION
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED
Format	APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD
Academic Sources	10 -20
Page Count	4-8 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Compensation and Benefits

Primary Response: Within the Discussion Board area, write 200–250 words that respond to the following questions with your thoughts, ideas, and comments. This will be the foundation for future discussions by your classmates. Be substantive and clear, and use examples to reinforce your ideas. For this Discussion Board, please complete the following: Hiring a new employee can make a big impact on a team. Managers work with HR to review resumes, interview candidates, and select the candidate that has the best fit for the job. Hiring is an important process because new talented employees can greatly enhance a company’s success. In this discussion, think of yourself as a manager and review this article on the qualities of a good employee.

Then, please discuss the following with your fellow classmates: Choose one quality of a good employee from the article. Why is the employee quality you chose the most important to you? Responses to Other Students: Respond to at least 2 of your fellow classmates with at least a 50–100-word reply about their Primary Response regarding items you found to be compelling and enlightening.

To help you with your discussion, please consider the following question: What differences or similarities do you see between your posting and other classmates’ postings? For assistance with your assignment, please use your text, Web resources, and all course materials.

Discussion Board Rubric Expectation Points Possible Points Earned Comments Application of Learning Material Content:

Post demonstrates understanding of Learning Material content. 20 Application of Course Knowledge:

Post contributes unique perspectives or insights gleaned from personal experience or examples from discipline. 20 DB Responses:

Responds substantively to two posts. Responses encourage interaction in the Discussion Board and classroom community. 20 Organization:

Post presents information logically and is clearly relevant to discussion topic. 8

Professional Language: Posts contain accurate grammar, spelling, and punctuation with few or no errors.

(APA formatting is not required.) 7 Total Points 75 Total Points Earned View a downloadable version of the Discussion Board Grading Rubric.

[Order Now]

Compensation and Benefits Assignment

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.