Order Number |
65363764423 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY/DISERTATION |
Writer Level |
PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED |
Format |
APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD |
Academic Sources |
10 -20 |
Page Count |
4-8 PAGES |
compare Malcom X’s and Martin Luther King’s approach to the Civil Rights Movement in the U.S
Title page include an Original title for your paper instructor name Student name the Course title Semester and date on a Seperate page
Text Requirement: Each of the following sections will be labeled in the paper
1.Introduction:set the stage for the paper,scope and purpose of the paper. You need to kindle interest in the reader here. (1-2 pages)
2.Body of the paper:Address your topic in this section and Provide your conclusion based on the information u presented in the essay and bibliography (4-6 pages)
3.Bibliography This section list all of the sources you used for the paper in MLA format. This does not Count towards the page count of the paper.
MLA 8th Edition will be used
Work Cited: MLA Format a minimum of 10 (ten) sources to be used for this paper Print, Electronic and other formats are accepted but a varied range will be required. The course textbook and encyclopedias are not considered to be one of the sources
5-7 pages is the length required for the paper. This is a 5-7 pages of text The Title page,a Bibliography is not included in this number The text should be 12-point font double-spaced, one inch margin about 250 words per page.(Number The Pages) Illustrations and are permitted but do not use them to try and fill space. Place them at the end of the paper on a Sepera Sheet Times new Roman and Arial are examples of acceptable fonts
Bibliography is Needed
Rough Draft is Needed
Final Draft is Needed
RUBRIC | |||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/