Order Number |
5676867878567 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
Format |
APA |
Academic Sources |
10 |
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
Paper 1: Defamation and Privacy, Total Points: 100 In the first paper for the class, I want you to analyze one of the cases in the “The Law of Journalism and Mass Communication” textbook relating to either defamation law or right to privacy. You can find the many of the cases from the chapter in the case archive provided on the Sage website.
This archive has also been posted on blackboard for you. Select one of the cases and provide a useful brief of the case and its implications on law moving forward. Your analysis should be 3-4 pages (double-spaced), using college level syntax and grammar, have a works cited list that has at least (3) sources—yes, you can include the textbook as a source. Please include a copy/link of your case with your paper. Here is what you need to include: 1. Give us the legal citation.
These are the answers to the questions. I expect you to identify and refer to the particular passages that establish constitutional precedent. Quote the Justices in your presentation and quote them in your handout. 6. Bottomline: What is/was the rule that this case established. Remember that the Courts say what the Constitution means, so, what does this case mean? What impact did it make? The paper will be due on April 19, 2020, 11:59 p.m.
Statement of Facts – 15 pts
Identifies and demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the main issues/problems in the case study.
Identifies and demonstrates an accomplished understanding of most of the issues/problems.
Identifies and demonstrates acceptable understanding of some of the issues/problems in the case study.
Analysis and Evaluation of Issues/Problems (i.e. Constitutional Questions) – 15 pts
Presents an insightful and thorough analysis of all identified issues/problems; includes all necessary mental calculations.
Presents a thorough analysis of most of the issues identified; missing some necessary mental calculations.
Presents a superficial or incomplete analysis of some of the identified issues; omits necessary mental calculations.
Recommendations on Effective Solutions/Strategies (I.e. Court Decisions) – 15 pts
Supports diagnosis and opinions with strong arguments and well- documented evidence; presents a balanced and critical view; interpretation is both reasonable and objective.
Supports diagnosis and opinions with limited reasoning and evidence; presents a somewhat one- sided argument; demonstrates little engagement with ideas presented.
Little or no action suggested and/or inappropriate solutions proposed to the issues in the case study.
Links to Course Readings and Additional Research (i.e. Reasoning of Decision/Bottom Line) – 15 pts
Makes appropriate and powerful connections between identified issues/ problems and the strategic concepts studied in the course readings and lectures; supplements case study with relevant and thoughtful research and documents all sources of information.
Makes appropriate but somewhat vague connections between identified issues/problems and concepts studied in readings and lectures; demonstrates limited command of the analytical tools studied; supplements case study with limited research.
Makes inappropriate or little connection between issues identified and the concepts studied in the readings; supplements case study, if at all, with incomplete research and documentation.
Writing Mechanics and Formatting Guidelines – 15 pts
Demonstrates clarity, conciseness and correctness; formatting is appropriate and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors.
Occasional grammar or spelling errors, but still a clear presentation of ideas; lacks organization, format or length.
Writing is unfocused, rambling, or contains serious errors; poorly organized and does not follow specified guidelines.