Cognitive Psychology Case Study Question

November 25, 2022

Cognitive Psychology Case Study Question

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Cognitive, Psychology, Case, Study, Question

[Order Now]

I’m studying for my Psychology class and need an explanation.

Case study 1

Christy, Juan, Mike, and Susan get together in Christy’s apartment one evening to eat pizza and strategize. They’re going to compete in the competition to come up with a strategy for combatting misinformation in Riverbend City.

“We’ll win the prize,” Christy says. “Our idea will work. Riverbend City can get back to normal.”

“I hope so,” Susan says. “The prize money could get my son through school and maybe pay for my college.”

“Did you see this?” Juan flips his phone around. “The news is reporting that Solutions, Inc. has almost found a solution and is sure to win the money.”

“We can’t beat them,” Christy says, slumping in her chair. “They’ve got all the money they need. And money means everything.”

“Money’s not the only thing that’s important,” Mike says.

“We need to prove our idea is better,” Juan says. “Let’s run an experiment and show that it works.”

Questions.

If you have participated in research as a participant, a researcher, or other experience, please share the following:

o What was the research about?

o What role did you play?

o Describe what you learned?

o Explain why this research is important to society.

Case study 2

Bruce is a middle-aged man who lives in Riverbend City, a mid-sized city in the Midwest. His daughter, Shayna lives with him while she goes to school and works a part-time job.

One morning, Bruce goes to the mailbox with his cup of coffee in hand. After opening his mail box and seeing that it’s full, he puts his coffee cup on top of the mailbox to use both hands to pull everything out. He closes the mailbox and turns right to walk down the street. A few minutes later, Shayna starts calling his name. She finds his coffee cup on the mailbox but sees no other trace of him. She freezes, looking up and down the street, unable to decide what to do next.

Question.

Briefly describe (using no more than 75 words) a classic cognitive psychology experiment and how it is currently relevant. Include a link to a video, website or article the talks about the experiment. Feel free to use a hashtag, such as the name of the experiment.

Professional Plagiarism Free Paper in APA/MLA/Harvard/Turabian Format, Instant Delivery, High Quality Submissions, 100% Unique, Turnitin Report Attached

Cognitive Psychology Case Study Question

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.