Client Facing Challenges Discussion Question

November 25, 2022

Client Facing Challenges Discussion Question

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Client, Facing, Challenges, Discussion, Question

[Order Now]

I’m working on a psychology question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.

Read the following scenario about a fictitious client, Maria and individually answer the questions below.

Maria, 22 years old, is an undergraduate student majoring in literature and is currently at school on scholarship. She was an excellent student in high school though she has always had a high amount of anxiety about her studies. She also has a history of anxiety surrounding social events, especially involving men; but has coped in the past by drinking a couple of alcoholic beverages to decrease her social “jitters” and worries about school. Recently, she has noticed her drinking has increased and on a couple of occasions she “blacked out.” She has been hung over the day after these drinking episodes, which has affected her school performance and attendance. In addition, she is embarrassed to learn from her roommate how she behaved while under the influence. The most recent drinking episode resulted in Maria missing an exam and she will now not be able to make higher than a D in her class. This may threaten her scholarship. She found out through a friend that her sorority is planning a meeting and will be discussing disciplinary actions for the members who are being poor representatives. Her friend heard that Maria was one of the women being “called out.” Her sorority is important to her and she feels scared she may be asked to leave.

When thinking about establishing a therapeutic relationship with this client what are some potential challenges that could arise? In composing your response, think back to your first discussion board and the readings in Chapter 1: Understanding Yourself and Others. Consider, any differences and/or similarities with this client, (both could potentially poses challenges), in your response.
How would you navigate these challenges?

Professional Plagiarism Free Paper in APA/MLA/Harvard/Turabian Format, Instant Delivery, High Quality Submissions, 100% Unique, Turnitin Report Attached

Client Facing Challenges Discussion Question

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.