CJ 4960 Comparative Criminal Justice Systems Capstone Project

December 13, 2022

CJ 4960 Comparative Criminal Justice Systems Capstone Project

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

CJ 4960, Comparative, Criminal, Justice, Systems, Capstone, Project

[Order Now]

Textbook Reichel, P. L. (2013). Comparative criminal justice systems: A topical approach (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River,

NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Grading Events & Grading Criteria Unless otherwise specified, all assignments must be submitted via Blackboard

Course Preparation Quiz 15 Points

Discussion Board (Week 1, 2, 4) 100 Points

Project One (Law Enforcement) 150 Points

Project Two (Criminal Law) 150 Points

Exam One 100 Points

Exam Two 100 Points

Tech Live Weekly Reflections 60 points

Total Points 675 Points

Class Participation/Discussion:

Students are expected to have read the assigned materials prior to the weekly module and be able to intelligently

respond to questions about and discuss the readings. Points will be based on the following criteria:

Response to the posted question/topic within the week of the module keeping in mind that more than opinion is being solicited. Support your opinions/arguments utilizing course material and/or other

relevant and academically oriented sources.

Response to at least two other students’ posts which is designed to foster interaction as well as designed to challenge one another to potentially look at topics or arguments from a differing viewpoint. Keep in

mind the intent is not to cause argument but rather to challenge thinking.

Students are encouraged to raise issues and ask questions regarding current or outside the classroom events that are related to the course. A student MUST have full participation with responding to all of the posted questions/topics for each module as well as a minimum of at least two responses to other students’ posts in order to attain the full one hundred (100) points for class participation.

http://online.indianatech.edu/tech-policies/policies/

Projects (2):

Students are required to write two (2) papers describing (2) major components of foreign country of the students choosing (instructor must approve selection). The assignments will require the student to research, write a paper, and make a presentation, by means of developing a PowerPoint presentation covering the material presented in the formal paper describing (1) Police/Law Enforcement of a foreign country and (2) The Criminal

Law Components of a foreign country. The specific topics and grading criteria for the written assignments and presentation follow and are incorporated into this syllabus.

Written assignments are to be word processed using Microsoft Word, size 12 New Times Roman font, double spaced with one (1) inch margins around the page (default), using the American Psychological Association (APA) citation method. Your research papers and presentations should be thorough and scholarly. Jargon, lingo, and street language are to be avoided and their use will decrease your grade.

By way of example, and not limitation, “cop” is generally unacceptable, “police officer” or “law enforcement officers” is preferred. A person may be “mentally ill” or “legally insane” (they are not the same), not “nuts” or “crazy”.

The material expected to be covered in each written project is covered toward the end of this syllabus. Keep in mind, the paper should be written as such. In other words, based off the material list pertaining to information that should be covered, make the information into a paper—do not simply bullet point answers.

Further, ensure that you are crediting the source(s) used for the information that you are referencing by utilizing the proper APA format. The written paper must be submitted prior to the date/time due, as noted in the course schedule, and submitted via Blackboard’s SafeAssign feature.

The PowerPoint portion of the assignment must be submitted via an electronic mail (email) attachment prior to the due date/time or utilizing the submit feature within the respective module under the assignment section. If the student runs into problems submitting the email due to size of the attachment, “note pages” of the presentation would be perfectly acceptable. If questions arise in regard to how to do so, in advance, ensure that you get with the instructor to work through PowerPoint to “print” the note pages if necessary.

[Order Now]

CJ 4960 Comparative Criminal Justice Systems Capstone Project

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.