Order Number |
636738393092 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
Format |
APA |
Academic Sources |
10 |
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
Due Date: 11:59 pm EST Sunday of Unit 5 Points: 100 Overview:
Teacher can inspire children to be adventurous and give them the confidence to try new things so they can develop creative problem-solving skills. There are countless ideas for art projects– but one of the best ways to help you to remember ideas – and convey enthusiasm – is to try them out yourself!
For this assignment, you will try an activity for an appropriate child developmental stage, reflect on the experience in an essay, and design a developmentally appropriate art activity. Note that it is the process not the product that counts for your activity creations so take a risk and be creative! Aspire to model confidence and risk taking by being adventuresome yourself! Instructions:
Chapter 11 Review. See categories below but go to the chapter for details and
illustrations:
Some Variations on Easel Painting
Cracked Paint and Crayon Drawings
Painting with Soft Objects
Cornmeal Paintings
Surprising Designs
Cotton Swab Painting
Button Printing
Sponge Painting
Paper Towel Painting
Crayon Surfaces
Finger Painting with Ice Cubes
Printing
Fabric Painting
Pinecone Printing
Combination Painting
Ideas to Encourage Drawing
CHS201 Creative Activity
Unit 5 Assignment: Do It, Remember It!
paragraphs total) that addresses the following:
Choose any activity from the “Activities for Children” list in the Chapter 11 Review and describe how you would design a developmentally appropriate art experience. Identify the age level of the children, the number of children in the group, the materials needed, the space required for the activity, length of the activity, safety considerations, and clean-up.
Requirements
Be sure to read the criteria below by which your work will be evaluated before you write and again after you write.
Evaluation Rubric for Do It, Remember It! Assignment
CRITERIA
Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement
Deficient
40 Points 32-39 Points 24-31 Points 0-23 Points
Photos Includes legible photos of 3 activity creations chosen from the “Activities for Children” list.
Includes legible photos of 2 activity creations chosen from the “Activities for Children” list.
Includes legible photos of 1 activity creation chosen from the “Activities for Children” list.
Does not include legible photos of activity creation chosen from the “Activities for Children” list.
20 Points 16-19 Points 12-15 Points 0-11 Points
Essay response to activity creation
Describes aspects/experience of doing each activity; Identifies developmental stage of each activity.
Mostly describes aspects/experience of doing each activity; Identifies developmental stage of each activity.
Missing some aspects/experience of doing activities; Missing some identification of developmental stages.
Incomplete essay that fails to address or inadequately addresses aspects/experience of doing activities; Fails to identify of developmental stages.
20 Points 16-19 Points 12-15 Points 0-11 Points
Developmentally appropriate art experience
Art experience design description includes all required components (child age level, the number of children in the group, materials needed, space required, activity length, safety considerations, and clean-up.)
Art experience design description includes most required components.
Art experience design description missing some required components.
Art experience design description missing many required components.
5 points 0 points
Report Length 1-2 double spaced pages with at least 3 paragraphs.
n/a n/a Less than 1-2 double spaced page; less than 3 paragraphs.
15 points 12 – 14 points 9 – 11 points 0 – 8 points
Clear and Professional Writing, Format Guidelines, and APA Reference Format
Writing and format are clear, professional, and error free. References (if used) are APA compliant and error free.
Few errors that do not impede professional presentation. References (if used) are compliant with few minor errors.
Some errors impede professional presentation. References (if used) are APA compliant with some errors.
Many errors impede professional presentation; guidelines not followed. References (if used) are not APA compliant or with many errors.
RUBRIC | |||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/