Chicago Longitudinal Study Case Study Question

November 28, 2022

Chicago Longitudinal Study Case Study Question

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Chicago Longitudinal Study Case Study Question

[Order Now]

per 3305:

Go to: http://www.chicagolongitudinalstudy.net/

This is a website of the Chicago Longitudinal Study, research which examines a same-age cohort of 1,539 students in Chicago Public Schools who grew up in high poverty neighborhoods. The study began in 1986 and is ongoing.

You are to identify the key variables in the study (independent and dependent), the research design (found in Chapter 7), and goals of the project.

Take a look at the reports that have been written and the newsletter about the project. Discuss topics such as costs, richness of data and design issues this type of research might pose. Write down your thoughts and answers on these issues, specific to this study.

This homework is worth 15 points, so I expect your answer to be at least 1/2 page in length. Be thorough to show you looked at the website and understand it.

2.What is the difference in a cross-sectional and a longitudinal study design? Also, there are several types of longitudinal designs. List each one and give a real-life example of a research study you could conduct using each of these types. word count: 250

[Order Now]

per 3312: Watch the following video clip:

https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x3vx6lw

Do you think that our society has concern for prisoners who are sexually assaulted? Why, or why not? Should those who are victims of such crimes have more protection or is this “what they get” as criminals? word count: 250

Chicago Longitudinal Study Case Study Question

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.