Chapter 15 Application Assessment Creation Assignment

Order Number

Type of Project

ESSAY

Writer Level

PHD VERIFIED

Format

APA

Academic Sources

10

Page Count

3-12 PAGES

To demonstrate comprehension of the course materials, i.e. the textbook and course activities.

To demonstrate the ability to differentiate between formative versus summative assessments.

To demonstrate the ability to use technology to create classroom activities.

To demonstrate clear, concise written language that is grammatically correct and uses appropriate vocabulary.

Create 2 assessments as if you were going to administer them to a class. The actual assessment must be included*. *Include a link to access your online assessment(s) and check to make sure it is accessible. The assessment must be your own creation and not something copied and pasted or “borrowed” from the internet. Plagiarism is not allowed.

Step 1: Decide on the Context

Choose a Grade Level: (Example: 1^st Grade)

Choose a Content Area: (Example: Science)

Choose a TNReady Standard (include the Number and explanation) https://www.tn.gov/education/instruction/academic-standards.html

Example: GLE 0107.Inq.1 Observe the world of familiar objects using the senses and tools

Example: SSP.03 K-2: Organize data from a variety of sources in order to: ● Compare and contrast multiple sources ● Recognize differences between multiple accounts ● Frame appropriate questions for further investigation

Choose which website(s) or app(s) you wish to use to create your assessments

Step 2: Assessment Creation

Formative Assessment: Create a Formative Assessment that would help you gauge where the students are at with their learning during instruction (use some sort of technology i.e., polleverywhere.com, clickers, Kahoot, etc.)

Summative Assessment: Create a Summative Assessment that would provide you feedback on the learning that took place over the standard you chose.

Step 3: Reflection

Write a one-page reflection about how you created this assignment. Include a reflection on what you took into consideration when thinking about what makes a good assessment.

Remember: The formative assessment and the summative assessment must be created as if you were going to use them in your classroom and included as part of this assignment. You must also use technology (a website or app) to administer at least one of the assessments.

Submission reminders

Include a link if appropriate to access the assessment you created on another website

APA Style (https://nscc.libguides.com/apastyle)

Submissions must be double spaced, 12pt font, 1’ margin.

Font can be Times New Roman, Calibri, Arial, or Gill Sans MT.

Submit the assignment in Microsoft word or rich text format (RTF).

Save the assignment to your computer and upload it to the dropbox

addressed thoroughly. Followed directions and all submission requirements.

addressed but less thoroughly. Followed most submission requirements.

addressed. Followed some submission requirements.

addressed. May or may not have followed submission requirements.

reflection that demonstrates some understanding of the impact of the topic on teachers and students.

The response is well organized using paragraph length discourse and appropriate headings where necessary.

The response is organized using some distinct paragraphs and may or may not employ the use of section headings.

The response is not well organized and fails to separate main ideas into separate paragraphs, and may not use section headings.

The response is hard to follow due to a lack of organization such as the use of separate paragraphs for main ideas and missing appropriate section headings.

95-100%

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

91-84  points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

50-85%

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

0-45%

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.