Change Theory Meets Change Reality Discussion

December 17, 2022

Description
Discussion 1: Change Theory Meets Change Reality
Applying research and evidence-based knowledge about change enhances the ability to effectively advocate for change that improves the teaching and learning of diverse learners and students with exceptionalities. In addition to your exploration of transformational and authentic leadership in the previous module, consider the readings and media on change leadership, specifically strategies in this module that apply change theory to the management of change in real-world education contexts. In this Discussion, you explore three change models that reinforce the concept that it is preferable to manage change rather than have it manage you.
Inherent in all of the models is the value of structured approaches to successfully manage change. These approaches include such elements as proactive and regular communication from a leader regarding the vision and the progress of change; the need to listen to and address stakeholder concerns; and the ability to empower stakeholders by providing tools to make change happen successfully, while consistently and positively supporting the change process. Consider how you might view the change theory models in the context of implementing change related to special education in your school setting, at the local, community, or at the district level.
Discussion:
Briefly describe the recent change related to special education in your local school, community, or district related to special education. Then respond to the following questions:
·Did the change reflect the stages of the three change models? If so, identify which model and support your rationale with evidence from the text.
·What role did the leader(s) play managing the change?
·How did the leader(s) support the people tasked with implementing the change?
·What role did the leaders communication play in the change?
·If you had been a leader in this situation, what suggestions might you offer to better implement the change?
Be sure to cite this modules media and Learning Resources, using proper APA format, as you craft your analysis.

I WILL SUBMIT THE CHAPTER 4, 5, AND 6 READINGS ONCE TUTOR IS CHOSEN

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.