Order Number |
636738393092 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
Format |
APA |
Academic Sources |
10 |
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
Given the increasing span of control, empowerment has become an industry norm. As managers delegate more authority and responsibility, associates have become empowered to do whatever it takes to delight the guest. Front-line associates are in a better position to know guests’ wants and needs than management, so it makes sense to empower them to take care of delighting guests. In the old days, associates had to check with management before making a decision to ensure guest delight. Let’s look at an example. A husband and wife check into a hotel that advertises a room rate that includes a buffet breakfast. Unfortunately, the wife catches a nasty virus and is not well enough to go down to enjoy the buffet breakfast. Her husband says that he will call her to let her know what’s offered at the buffet, so she can choose something and he can bring it up for her. He goes down to the restaurant and dutifully calls her to tell her what’s available. She tells him what she wants: scrambled eggs and bacon. When the husband explains to a server that his wife is sick and not able to come down for the buffet and requests a tray to carry up her breakfast, the server listens and goes to consult a more senior server, but not the manager. The husband then explains all over again and once more asks for a tray. This time he is told that food cannot be taken upstairs. The husband then says, “My wife is sick and needs something to
eat and drink. We’ve already paid for it Get the manager here now!” The
server later comes over to say that the duty manager says the husband can choose anything from the cold section of the buffet but not the hot part. That does it. The guest demands that the general manager, not the duty manager, be summoned. You get the picture. All of this could have been avoided if only the associates had been empowered to use a little discretion.
Centralization
Decentralization
528 528 528
Centralization and Decentralization
Some organizations make most of the decisions at the corporate office and inform unit managers of them. This process is called centralization. If the top managers make the organization’s key decisions with little or no input from subordinates, then the organization is centralized. Other organizations make most of the decisions at the unit level or with input from associates. This is decentralization. In reality, organizations are never completely centralized or decentralized because they could not function if all decisions were made by the CEO, nor could they function properly if all decisions were made at the lowest level. Figure 16-4 illustrates the difference between a centralized and a decentralized organization.
Many companies have become more centralized in an effort to save costs and improve service to associates. Because of rapid changes in the hospitality business, organizations are becoming more flexible and responsive. This means the organizations are becoming more decentralized. A good example is Choice Hotels’ restructuring of its franchise services. It has centralized franchising services under one umbrella and created one brand management position that oversees the company’s eight brands. As a result, the company closed five market offices. In large companies especially, lower-level managers who are “closer to the action” and typically have more detailed knowledge about problems and how best to solve them are empowered to delight the guest.
DrXISlOX
Figure 16-4 Centralization versus Decentralization in an Organization.
► Check Your Knowledge
Organizational Design Decisions
Organizations are structured in different ways, depending on which structure best suits their needs. A company with 20 associates will look very different from one with 10,000 associates. But even organizations of comparable size don’t necessarily have similar structures. What works for one organization may not work for another. How do managers decide which is the best structure for them? That decision depends on certain contingency factors that we are about to discuss.
Coordination of Activities
When there are only a few associates in an operation, everyone can catch up quickly, but as the business expands, problems can and do occur unless there is good coordination of activities. The hospitality business is fast paced— guests want something now or even sooner! Departments need to communicate quickly and often to keep up with guest requests. You may have experienced an occasion when something did not go as planned—perhaps a checkout delay at your hotel or charges on your bin tbat -were not -yours—but now you’re in a rush to get to the airport. You get the picture—someone made a mistake!
Centralization
Decentralization 529
RUBRIC | |||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/