case study for covid 19. lifespan developmental

December 21, 2022

case study for covid 19. lifespan developmental

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

case study for covid 19. lifespan developmental

[Order Now]

Description

developmental psychology professor Morley… keep scrolling down until you find the topic saying case study. I am a psychology major so need this to be a paper and not presentation. do not include the title page or reference page as part of the document order. Need to keep the questions simple and specifically on what his habits were before the shutdown and during for COVID 19.

Not how things have been changing over time- specifically right before and then during. Do not ask him about Trump for this case study. Need to ask about physical, cognitive, social, and nutrition before and after and analyze what the course is teaching us about those areas of development for his age. You can finish with open-ended questions- anything he would like to add and a cross-cultural question about if this were to happen while living in India would it be similar or different? These questions are leading- when we conduct research we need to avoid that and ask simple questions that allow the person to answer how they would.

For the papers- do not use direct quotations- instead read and understand the background material on development for teh age of your person (take notes) but then don’t look at the reference- write it in your own words (paraphrase) but cite the source of your information. When you submit the paper, the turninit will tell you how much of your paper overlaps with published sources. I can see all these and if there is a problem I will let you know and you will have the opportunity to revise it.

I am most interested in

1. do you know what you are talking about- are you showing me as you describe development for this age that you understand the theories and concepts?

2. in you summary and conclusion, are you applying this understanding? is there evidence of your own thought and critical thinking?

For AU Psychology Majors, this is one of the first CAP courses in the sequence, so I do not expect your papers to be perfect. Good writing, and in particular APA writing style (clear, concise, to the point, no wordiness or extra phrases like “that being said” or “in other words” that don’t add to what you are saying and only distract) takes time, learning and feedback. Avoid slang and informal language

[Order Now]

case study for covid 19. lifespan developmental

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.