Case Study Cultural Diversity

February 16, 2023

Case Study Cultural Diversity

Order Number	78576465365343
Type of Project	ESSAY/DISERTATION
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED
Format	APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD
Academic Sources	10 -20
Page Count	4-8 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Case Study Cultural Diversity

Cultural Diversity Globalization (Healthcare Leaders) Assignment

Complete the following written assignment given the questions below provided. A minimum of TWO (2) references are required. References can come from a refereed journal article, course textbook, and or a creditable Internet source. The assignment must be typed on a Word Document with size 12 font, font names that should be used are Times New Roman or Calabria (not both), normal margins (no more than 1 inch), double spaced. This assignment must be in APA format. The assignment requires 2-4 pages (Excluding Title and Reference Page). The following should be included in your assignment. Assignment Layout:

Title Page: • Student Name (First and Last), Student Panther ID Number and Title
Body of Paper: Use below questions as a template within your paper: • What does “globalization” mean? Min of one paragraph (4-6 complete sentences) • What does it mean to be “culturally competent”? Min of one paragraph (4-6 complete sentences) • What are our obligations as citizens in a global society? Min of one paragraph (4-6 complete sentences) • How do those obligations materialize for us as Healthcare Leaders in a global society? Min of one paragraph (4-6 complete sentences) • How can Healthcare Leaders better prepare themselves for the cultural challenges they will be facing within the healthcare arena in the future? Min of two paragraph (4-6 complete sentences (per paragraph)
References: • Provide a separate References page of the sources used for your written assignment (APA format). • Two references are required. You can use the course textbook, articles and or any credible resource, etc. as an additional references. Make sure you cite your sources whenever paraphrasing or directly quoting someone else’s work.

[Order Now]

Case Study Cultural Diversity

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.