case of negligence per sec  

case of negligence per sec  

Instructions/Descriptions

case of negligence per sec  

Homework Assignment for Week 11.

All of the questions are true/false or multiple choice. Do not include any of the question in your answer, and there is no need to explain your answer. Please indicate the number of the question and the answer. Example: 1. True, 2. False, etc.

1. True or false. In the majority of states, in a case of negligence per se, the plaintiff would only have to prove violation of a statute in order to show negligent conduct.
2. True or false. If negligence of the plaintiff and negligence of the defendant proximately caused the injury and damage sustained by the plaintiff, the plaintiff can recover some damages in those states where contributory negligence is still recognized.
3. True or false. A tiger gets loose from the tent of a circus and mauls a passerby. The circus is able to prove that it has always treated the animal well and that it took every precaution possible to make sure others were not injured by the animal. The circus has no liability for the injury caused by the animal. [Order Now]
4. True or false. The duty of employers includes the duty to exercise reasonable care in hiring, training, supervising, and retaining employees. This duty is independent of the vicarious liability of an employer for an employee’s tortious conduct during the course of employment.
5. True or false. There is an established rule in the law of torts that even one who has not created a peril has a duty to take affirmative action to assist an imperiled person, no matter what the relationship with that person, when the imperiled person can be saved from harm at little or no personal risk to the rescuer.
6. By law, all apartment buildings in the state where Mary lives must have smoke alarms in the ceilings. Mary suffers smoke inhalation because the smoke alarm in her apartment building was not yet installed. To win a negligence action against the building owner, Mary would have to prove:
7. A duty existed toward her.
8. A breach of that duty.
9. Injury and causation.
10. All of the above.
11. Pat and Sally started a charcoal fire for Sally’s backyard barbecue and left it uncovered. Then Sally went into the kitchen to make hamburger patties. While Sally was inside, Pat backed up to catch a football and hit the grill, knocking the coals onto his feet. In a pure comparative negligence state, who is liable?
12. Sally is liable for ALL of Pat’s injuries.
13. Sally is liable for Pat’s injuries in proportion to the degree of fault or negligence found against her.[Order Now]
14. Sally is not liable for any of Pat’s injuries.
15. Sally is liable for Pat’s injuries only if Pat was more negligent than Sally.

case of negligence per sec  

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!