Case: Monsanto

February 9, 2023

Case: Monsanto

Order Number	65363737383
Type of Project	ESSAY/DISERTATION
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED
Format	APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD
Academic Sources	10 -20
Page Count	4-8 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Case: Monsanto

Overview

The student will write two separate Case Assignments from the Ferrell textbook. There must be a clear thesis statement with an introduction that provides a clear overview of the paper’s contents. The issue(s) raised in the topic must be treated objectively. The conclusion must offer a robust summary of the issues treated in the paper and suggestions for further study. The paper will be written to cover the topic to sufficient depth for an upper-class research paper and provide a substantive evaluation of the ethical issue(s).

Instructions

You will research what the literature says about the issues in each case and what the secular worldview suggests would be the course or courses of action that decision makers within the organization should have taken to remedy the dilemma. You will also research the Bible for remedies that a Christian or follower of God should have taken. Make recommendations from both worldly and biblical views that decision makers should have implemented to avoid the ethical situation. Support your recommendations using content from the selected scholarly resources.

Your assignment must include evidence of the following:

Identify Ethical Issue(s) and Stakeholders, Evaluation of Ethical Implications, Develop Plan of Action, Integrate Biblical Worldview in Value Judgments, Research Support in Application of Ethical Solution(s), and Writing Style (APA formatting), grammatical errors and sentence structure.
Each assignment should be between 5-6 pages not including the title and references pages
Each assignment must be written in current APA format
Each assignment must include 5 peer reviewed, scholarly sources. All sources must be of a scholarly nature, either textbooks or journal articles from peer-reviewed journals and the Bible. All citations should be in the References section and included in-text. As this is a paper that requires research, it must be written in third person.

Case: Monsanto Assignment can be found in the Ferrell textbook, “Monsanto Attempts to Balance Stakeholder Interests.” The paper must use the following (3) Level 1 headings that correspond to the case points:

Monsanto’s Ethical Culture and Stakeholders
Evaluation of Ethical Implications of Growing GMO Seed
Recommended Plan of Action
Integration of Biblical Worldview and Value Judgments

[Order Now]

Case: Monsanto

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.