Case Health Care Administration Assignment

December 27, 2022

Case Health Care Administration Assignment

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

[Order Now]

Case Health Care Administration Assignment

Modules/Module3/Mod3Case.html
Module 3 – Case
Health Care Administration: Quality and Patient Safety
Assignment Overview
According to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (n.d.), “The Institute of Medicine defines health care quality as ‘the degree to which health care services for individuals and populations increase the likelihood of desired health outcomes and are consistent with current professional knowledge.’ ”

The Institute of Medicine further defines quality as having the following six properties or domains:

Effectiveness. Relates to providing care processes and achieving outcomes as supported by scientific evidence.
Efficiency. Relates to maximizing the quality of a comparable unit of health care delivered or unit of health benefit achieved for a given unit of health care resources used.
Equity. Relates to providing health care of equal quality to those who may differ in personal characteristics other than their clinical condition or preferences for care.
Patient-centeredness. Relates to meeting patients’ needs and preferences and providing education and support.
Safety. Relates to actual or potential bodily harm.
Timeliness. Relates to obtaining needed care while minimizing delays.
AHRQ. (n.d.). Understanding quality measurement. Retrieved from https://www.ahrq.gov/professionals/quality-patient-safety/quality-resources/tools/chtoolbx/understand/index.html

Case Assignment
Review the following source:

Wyszewianski, L. (2014). Chapter 2: Basic concepts of healthcare quality. In M. S. Joshi, E. R. Ransom, D. B. Nash, & S. B. Ransom, (Eds.), The healthcare quality book: Vision, strategy and tools (3rd ed.). Retrieved from the Trident Online Library.

In a 2- to 3-page paper, you are to write an essay providing the following:

Rank the 6 domains in order of importance starting with the most important to the least important.
Define, discuss, and explain the importance of each domain. Be sure to cite reliable sources.
Provide a rationale to support your rankings for each domain. The use of health care examples is encouraged and citations from reliable sources to support your rationale are required.
Your essay should have 8 robust paragraphs: an introduction, a paragraph for each domain (6 paragraphs to make up the body of the paper), and a conclusion.

Assignment Expectations
Conduct additional research to gather sufficient information to justify/support your thoughts and analysis.
Limit your response to a maximum of 3 pages.
Support your proposal with peer-reviewed articles, with 2 or 3 references.
Use the following link for additional information on how to recognize peer-reviewed journals. Angelo State University Library. (n.d.). Library guide: How to recognize peer reviewed (refereed journals). Retrieved from https://www.angelo.edu/services/library/handouts/peerrev.php
You may use the following source to assist in formatting your assignment. Purdue Online Writing Lab. (n.d.). General APA guidelines. Retrieved from https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/.
For additional information on reliability of sources review the following source: NIH. (n.d.). Finding and evaluating online resources. Retrieved from https://nccih.nih.gov/health/webresources
Review Library Tutorial 1 to review how to locate peer-reviewed articles in the Trident Online Library.
Privacy Policy | Contact

[Order Now]

Case Health Care Administration Assignment

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.