Buy Wireless Networks And Communication

December 23, 2022

Buy Wireless Networks And Communication

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Buy Wireless Networks And Communication

MITS5003 Wireless Networks & Communication –

2019SS

Research Study

Submission Due Date: 17/01/2020 before 5 pm

Submission Guidelines:

All submissions are to be submitted through turn-it-in. Drop-boxes linked to turn-it-in will be

set up in the Unit of Study Moodle account. Assignments not submitted through these drop-

boxes will not be considered.

Submissions must be made by the due date and time.

The turn-it-in similarity score will be used in determining the level if any of plagiarism. Turn-

it-in will check conference web-sites, Journal articles, the Web and your own class member

submissions for plagiarism. You can see your turn-it-in similarity score when you submit your

assignment to the appropriate drop-box. If this is a concern you will have a chance to change

your assignment and re-submit. However, re-submission is only allowed prior to the

submission due date and time. After the due date and time have elapsed you cannot make

re-submissions and you will have to live with the similarity score as there will be no chance

for changing. Thus, plan early and submit early to take advantage of this feature. You can

make multiple submissions, but please remember we only see the last submission, and the

date and time you submitted will be taken from that submission.

Your document should be a single word or pdf document containing your report.

This research study requires in-depth reading and analysis of a single specific topic. This one

topic can be of your choice, but the topic must have been covered in this course.

You require to take one research paper of that topic and make a small report on that research

paper which should contain the following:

• Introduction to the topic

• Introduction to that paper, their main work.

• Detail description of the methodologies employed in that paper.

• Comparison of the results reported in that paper with others.

• Your comments on the advantages/disadvantages/superiority of that paper’s

methodology.

• Suggest your changes/future-directions for that paper to improve it (if any).

• Conclusion.

• References.

The research paper you need to choose should be published work in well-reputed Journals

or Conferences.

[Order Now]

Buy Wireless Networks And Communication

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.