Buy Theory Comparison Analysis Assignment

December 29, 2022

Buy Theory Comparison Analysis Assignment

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Buy Theory Comparison Analysis Assignment

Benchmark – Theory Comparison Analysis
For this assignment, in 1,000 words, you will need to complete the following:

Select a topic in media of your choice (e.g., violence in video games; social media use by celebrities; gender portrayals in television shows). Analyze how researchers using each of the following theories would approach studying the topic.

Framing Theory
Social Learning Theory
Critical Theory
In the analysis, be sure to include:

The types of data each theory would use to study the topic
The types of methods each theorist would use to collect and analyze data
Comparison of the strengths and limitations of each approach to study the topic
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the scoring guide prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

Benchmark Information:

This assignment assesses the following programmatic competency:

Master of Arts in Communication with an Emphasis in Education

2.2: Compare and contrast how different theories are applied to a situation.

Buy Theory Comparison Analysis Assignment

Grading Rubric

Buy Theory Comparison Analysis Assignment

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.