Buy Technology In Counterterrorism Proposal

December 24, 2022

Buy Technology In Counterterrorism Proposal

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

[Order Now]

Buy Technology In Counterterrorism Proposal

Your team works for a technology company and are making a proposal to the local counterterrorism agency on the type of technology they should use to counter terrorism.

Select a technological trend. The trend can be a completely new technology that currently does not exist or is not ready to be widely used yet or an existing technology that has never been used to counter terrorism but may be used in that capacity.

Buy Technology In Counterterrorism Proposal

Drones sound good. existing technologies to thwart terrorism include computers, biometrics, defense systems, aircraft radars, scanning and detection systems, smart cameras, recognition software, advanced AI systems.

Write a 350 to 400-word proposal advocating the use of this technology to the local counterterrorism agency. Include the following in your proposal:

Describe the technology trend that your company is selling.
Format your proposal following APA guidelines.

Buy Technology In Counterterrorism Proposal

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.