Buy Strategic Marketing Discussionn Assignment

December 30, 2022

Buy Strategic Marketing Discussionn Assignment

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Buy Strategic Marketing Discussionn Assignment

Validate that your paper is under 25%

The Practical Connection Assignment for this class asks that you reflect on your experiences by responding to the following questions:
1) In what ways have you improved as a student/learner/writer/scientist/strategist? What brought about those improvements? Include mention of a course activity that contains specific experiences, readings, assignments, or discussions that supports your point.
2) In terms of the semester paper, what challenges did you face in completing the assignment? How did you address/troubleshoot them?
3) Discuss your best work for this course and explain why it’s your best. Be specific.
4) What learning and skills would you identify as important take-aways from this course? How does what you have learned connect with your current job? How do the skills you have refined connect with your current job?

Requirements:

Provide a 500 word minimum reflection.
Use of proper APA formatting and citations. Use TWO authored supporting evidence from outside resources. These sources must be properly cited in APA format. Use subject headers like Introduction & Conclusion.
Share a personal connection that identifies specific knowledge and theories from this course.
Demonstrate a connection to your current work environment. If you are not employed, demonstrate a connection to your desired work environment.
Demonstrate a connection to your school in regards to brand management, The University of Cumberlands as well.
Due on Sunday of Week Seven
Grading Criteria

Possible Points

Points Earned

CONTENT:
Assignment is well written, and ideas are well developed and explained. Demonstrates strong writing skills. 500-Words minimum delivered.
Student strongly demonstrates the practical application, or ability to apply, of course objectives within a work environment & school. Focus on this course only.

Minus 5 points if no subject headers are used for organization.

Two authored references

APA Format, Subject Headers used for organization and spelling and grammar. Assignment strongly demonstrates graduate-level proficiency in organization, grammar, and style.

TOTAL

[Order Now]

Buy Strategic Marketing Discussionn Assignment

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.