Buy Social Issues Discussion Assignment

January 4, 2023

Buy Social Issues Discussion Assignment

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Buy Social Issues Discussion Assignment

Assignment 1 (Social Issue): due by 11:59pm on Wednesday, December 14

Select a social issue that interests you, such as racism in the criminal justice system or otherwise, Internet use, the inflation, homophobia, and crime. List at least four of your beliefs about this phenomenon. Try to identify the sources of each of these beliefs.

I would like you to write 3 paragraphs with the following information:

Paragraph 1: Identify the social issue of your choice. Explain this social issue and describe it in detail. This paragraph should be at least 6 sentences long and you should cite all sources you include.

Paragraph 2: Describe, in detail, at least four of your beliefs about this issue. This paragraph should be at least 6 sentences long and you should cite all sources you include.

Paragraph 3: State and describe in detail where you think sources of your beliefs on this issue come from. This paragraph should be at least 6 sentences long and you should cite all sources you include.

Additional instructions:

These three paragraphs need to be at least 250 words long each.

Make sure you answer each item fully, and make sure you use correct punctuation and grammar. You will lose points if you have grammatical and/or punctuation mistakes.

This assignment must be submitted as a Word document (doc or docx).

Make sure that you cite all facts and information you include in the paper. This is not a paper based only on your opinion, so you need to use academic sources to gather information. You need to cite the work of others in ASA style. You will lose points if you don’t cite the work of others, or if you don’t cite it correctly.

Make sure that your sources are reputable and valid. For instance, don’t use Wikipedia or potentially biased sources. If you have a question about the validity of a source, feel free to email me.

You must include a works cited page. This page must be in ASA format. You will lose points if this page is missing or if it’s not in the correct format. See the guidelines below for help.

ASA intext citations: https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/asa_style/in_text_citation_references.htmlLinks to an external site.

ASA reference page formatting: https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/asa_style/references_page_formatting.htmlLinks to an external site. –

-make s
Copy text

[Order Now]

Buy Social Issues Discussion Assignment

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.