Order Number |
636738393092 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
Format |
APA |
Academic Sources |
10 |
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
Buy SCI 220 Lifestyle Analysis Worksheet
SCI 220 Week 4 Assignment Lifestyle Analysis Worksheet (***** Original Work + Filled All Worksheet Details + References *****)
Complete the University of Phoenix Material: Lifestyle Analysis Worksheet.
Lifestyle Analysis
Consider the following questions concerning sedentary and physically active persons. Answer each question in 75 to 125 words each in the space provided.
Questions for both lifestyles
Sedentary person
Physically active person
What are this person’s nutrition needs?
What are the possible health and physical risks for this person’s lifestyle?
What recommendations would you make to create a healthier life for this person?
Do this person’s parents play a genetically influential role in their weight or health?
Would childhood exercise have had any influence on how active this person is today? Why or why not?
SCI 220 Week Four Lifestyle Analysis Worksheet
SCI/220 SCI220 Week 4 Lifestyle Analysis Worksheet
Buy SCI 220 Lifestyle Analysis Worksheet
Grading Rubric
Buy SCI 220 Lifestyle Analysis Worksheet
RUBRIC | |||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow