Buy Reorganization Report Discussion Assignment

January 5, 2023

Buy Reorganization Report Discussion Assignment

Order Number	65363737383
Type of Project	ESSAY/DISERTATION
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED
Format	APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD
Academic Sources	10 -20
Page Count	4-8 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Buy Reorganization Report Discussion Assignment

Deliverable 7 – Reorganization Report
Assignment Content
Competencies
Determine the value of organizational behavior.
Assess employee contributions within an organization.
Critique factors that influence and motivate employees.
Justify the importance of building organizational relationships.
Apply conflict management and negotiation strategies to decision-making.
Analyze the influence leaders have on organizational change.
Scenario
You are an organizational behavior consultant, and your role is to analyze a company’s overall performance. As a consultant, you conduct observation, analysis, and suggestions for workplace improvement to help organizations achieve overall success. An American company called NoJax Inc. has hired you based on your ability to demonstrate professionalism and skillset as an OB analyst.

You have been asked by NoJax to come in as a consultant and analyze the business for factors that impact the company’s organizational behavior. NoJax Inc. would like to ensure that their company design is current and that its employees are as efficient as possible. You have been analyzing several elements of the organization structure and behaviors using the NoJax Company background document to identify improvement areas. You will use that information to provide NoJax with a new reorganization plan to continue their success, be more efficient, and stay ahead of their competition.
Instructions
Review the NoJax Company background document as part of your analysis and create a reorganization report that:

Includes an executive summary that discusses the value of organizational behavior analysis for NoJax and challenges and opportunities in applying your recommendations.

Examines the big-five personality traits for your analysis of the workforce from the background document and determine what personalities and personal values are a good “organizational fit” for NoJax Inc.

Analyzes policies that can improve employee motivation and how these policies might influence employee behavior, attitudes, and motivation. Note: policies may need to be updated.

Proposes one change for each of NoJax’s barriers and then discuss how the changes will create more effective and supportive communication to build better relationships.

Details the process of decision-making NoJax currently uses and provides recommendations on how they can better use the negotiation process, ensuring NoJax is making each step of the decision-making process more efficient.

Summarizes how each management person should best use their management style to have the most significant positive influential impact on employees.

Additionally, identify the three essential elements to management, maintaining a balance between the current culture, and improving relationships to minimize resistance to change.

Uses examples to support understanding of concepts in a well-defined reorganization report

Provides attribution for credible references used in the development of content ideas following academic guidelines
As always, please keep in mind who your audience is and use correct grammar and spelling

NoJax Company Background

Use the Writing Lab for timely feedback to help you fine-tune your deliverable before you submit it for grading.

Peer tutoring may be available for this course. Search for course-specific tutoring within Tutor Match.

Resources
Gale Virtual Reference Library
Discovery
Business via ProQuest
APA Guide
Executive Summary tab in the Business Writing Guide
Grammarly is available to assist you with proofreading your work.

Buy Reorganization Report Discussion Assignment

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.