Buy Proficient Teacher Observation And Feedback

December 28, 2022

Buy Proficient Teacher Observation And Feedback

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Buy Proficient Teacher Observation And Feedback

Proficient teachers are the backbone of an effective school. Providing feedback on observations of proficient teachers allows for their continued professional growth. As a building principal, you must provide support and feedback to proficient teachers as well as to beginning teachers.

Allocate at least 2 hours in the field to support this field experience.

Coordinate with your principal mentor to schedule and conduct an informal observation of a proficient teacher. The observation should be at least 10 minutes long and focus on the effectiveness of instruction and quality of the instructional environment, as well as anything else that might be on the tool used at your site. If a tool is not used, follow the lead of your principal mentor as to how they record informal observations. Share your written observations with your principal mentor and discuss your findings (inter-rater reliability).

Following your observation, collaborate with your principal mentor to conduct a post-observation conference with the teacher and share your positive feedback. Allow the teacher to reflect upon the activities and outcomes that took place during the observation and ask clarifying questions.

Use any remaining field experience hours to assist the principal mentor and, provided permission, seek opportunities to observe and/or assist the principal mentor.

In 250-500 words, summarize your experiences collaborating with the principal mentor and providing feedback during the post-observation conference. Incorporate PSEL Standard 6 into your reflection and describe how you will apply what you have learned to your future professional practice.

APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

Grading Rubric

Buy Proficient Teacher Observation And Feedback

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.