Buy Peer-Group Dynamics And Mechanisms

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

[Order Now]

Buy Peer-Group Dynamics And Mechanisms

Assignment 1: Discussion—Peer-Group Dynamics and Mechanisms

Understanding peer dynamics is a very important aspect of child relationships, especially when the child reaches the teenage years. These peer group dynamics become a powerful tool for shaping behavior in positive and negative ways.

Using the module readings, the Argosy University online library resources, and the Internet, research peer group socialization mechanisms and peer group dynamics. Then, do the following:

Select one age group to which you want to apply your analysis of peer group socialization mechanisms and dynamics.
Select one of the following:
One peer-group mechanism (such as reinforcement, modeling, punishment, or apprenticeship)
One peer-group dynamic (such as inclusion/exclusion, clique inclusionary/exclusionary techniques, bullies and victims, gangs, peer collaboration, tutoring, or counseling)
Based on your choices and research, respond to the following:

Explain how your chosen mechanism or dynamic for one child shapes the behavior of another. For example, how does the reinforcement of one child’s behavior impact the behavior of another child?
How could some of the following developmental tasks of your chosen age group be influenced positively or negatively by your selected mechanism or dynamic?
Belonging needs
Social interaction
Self-image
Getting along with others
Moral and value development
Personal independence
Write your initial response in a minimum of 300–400 words. Apply APA standards to citation of sources, including use of in-text citations and full references. Incorporate information from at least two academic sources to support your statements or ideas. Academic sources could include your textbook, required readings for this week, or academic journal articles found in the Argosy University online library. Consider commenting on the following:

Do you agree with your peers’ explanations of how the chosen mechanism or dynamic for one child shapes the behavior of another and influences the listed developmental tasks? Why or why not?
Suggest an alternative explanation if the dynamic or mechanism selected by your peers is different from your choice. Give reasons for your explanations.
Select a dynamic or mechanism different from your earlier choice and explain its impact.
Assignment 1: Discussion—Peer-Group Dynamics and Mechanisms

Understanding peer dynamics is a very important aspect of child relationships, especially when the child reaches the teenage years. These peer group dynamics become a powerful tool for shaping behavior in positive and negative ways.

Using the module readings, the Argosy University online library resources, and the Internet, research peer group socialization mechanisms and peer group dynamics. Then, do the following:

Select one age group to which you want to apply your analysis of peer group socialization mechanisms and dynamics.
Select one of the following:
One peer-group mechanism (such as reinforcement, modeling, punishment, or apprenticeship)
One peer-group dynamic (such as inclusion/exclusion, clique inclusionary/exclusionary techniques, bullies and victims, gangs, peer collaboration, tutoring, or counseling)
Based on your choices and research, respond to the following:

Explain how your chosen mechanism or dynamic for one child shapes the behavior of another. For example, how does the reinforcement of one child’s behavior impact the behavior of another child?
How could some of the following developmental tasks of your chosen age group be influenced positively or negatively by your selected mechanism or dynamic?
Belonging needs
Social interaction
Self-image
Getting along with others
Moral and value development
Personal independence
Write your initial response in a minimum of 300–400 words. Apply APA standards to citation of sources, including use of in-text citations and full references. Incorporate information from at least two academic sources to support your statements or ideas. Academic sources could include your textbook, required readings for this week, or academic journal articles found in the Argosy University online library. Consider commenting on the following:

Do you agree with your peers’ explanations of how the chosen mechanism or dynamic for one child shapes the behavior of another and influences the listed developmental tasks? Why or why not?
Suggest an alternative explanation if the dynamic or mechanism selected by your peers is different from your choice. Give reasons for your explanations.
Select a dynamic or mechanism different from your earlier choice and explain its impact.

[Order Now]

Buy Peer-Group Dynamics And Mechanisms

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.