Buy Painting Analysis & Reflection Essay Assignment

December 29, 2022

Buy Painting Analysis & Reflection Essay Assignment

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Buy Painting Analysis & Reflection Essay Assignment

Required Resources Read/review the following resources for this activity:

· Textbook: Chapter 4

· Lesson

· Minimum of 3 scholarly sources (in addition to the textbook)

Instructions As part of the discussion this week, you made a brief exploration of a work of art to understand its subject, meaning, and intent. In this assignment, you will explore an artwork in more depth to consider the context in which it was created. Choose any painting, and address the following:

· Explain the artistic movement associated with the work of art.

· Describe the style of the artist (How is the artist unique within the movement?)

· Examine in some depth the influences that shaped the work. Address at least 2 of the following:

· Stylistic influences

· Subject/content influences

· Cross-disciplinary influences such as literature, philosophy, music, science, technology, etc.

· Historical influences

· Political influences

· Reflect on your learning.

· How did your research enhance your appreciation of the artwork?

· How does understanding the context of a work help in interpreting it?

Include the following in your paper:

· Name of the painting

· Name of the artist

· Date created

· Image of the painting

Writing Requirements (APA format)

· Length: 1.5-2 pages (not including title page, references page, image, or caption for artwork)

· 1-inch margins

· Double spaced

· 12-point Times New Roman font

· Title page

· References page (minimum of 3 scholarly sources)

Buy Painting Analysis & Reflection Essay Assignment

Grading Rubric

Buy Painting Analysis & Reflection Essay Assignment

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.