Buy Organisational Development Assignment

December 28, 2022

Buy Organisational Development Assignment

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Buy Organisational Development Assignment

BEM3051

University of Exeter

Business School

January 2021

Organisational Development Exam

Module Convenor: Allan Lee

You have 2 weeks to complete and submit this paper from the time of its

release Intended duration of paper: 14 Days

Answer TWO questions

All questions are worth equal marks.

Word count [1000] (+/- 10%) (per question)

Word count does not include citations and references

Due Date:18th January

This is an Open Book exam

Additional Materials needed:

None

With reference to theory, research and organisational examples where appropriate, answer any two of the questions below. All questions are worth equal marks

1. “Leaders should try to develop the same quality relationships with all their followers”

Critically discuss this statement

2. Critically evaluate two approaches to understanding job design

3. How can social identity theory help explain effective leadership?

4. Why is the need to belong important? (50%) and how can it be met by organisations?

(50%)

5. What does theory and research related to interpersonal influence and persuasion tell us about leadership?

6. “To motivate employees’ organisations should focus on money.” Critically discuss

this statement with reference to relevant motivation theory.

Grading Rubric

Buy Organisational Development Assignment

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.