Buy Management Of Health Care Organizations

December 23, 2022

Buy Management Of Health Care Organizations

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Buy Management Of Health Care Organizations

[Order Now]

Buy Management Of Health Care Organizations

Management of Health Care Organizations: Assignment Week 2

Critical Reflection Paper: Chapters 4, 5 & 6.

Objective: To critically reflect your understanding of the readings and your ability to apply them to your Health care Setting.

ASSIGNMENT GUIDELINES (10%):

Students will critically evaluate the readings from Chapter 4, 5, and 6 in your textbook. This assignment is planned to help you review, appraisal, and apply the readings to your Health Care organization managing for Marketing and performance as well as become Prepared for emergencies and Structuring for Improvement of the Healthcare Organization.

You need to read the article (in the additional weekly reading resources localize in the Syllabus and also in the Lectures link) assigned for week 2 and develop a 2 page paper reflecting your understanding and capability to apply the readings to your Health Care organization managing. Each paper must be typewritten with 12-point font and double-spaced with standard margins. Follow APA format when referring to the selected articles and include a reference page.

EACH PAPER SHOULD INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING:

1. Introduction (25%) Provide a brief synopsis of the meaning (not a description) of each Chapter and articles you read, in your own words.

2. Your Critique (50%)

What is your reply to the content of the articles and the chapters?

What did you learn about Marketing Tools and techniques? How you can apply them to improve your Health Care Setting?

What did you acquire about get ready for an Emergency? How you can report an emergency using The National Incident Management System?

Did these Chapter and articles change your judgements and Opinions about Structural Contingency Theory? If so, how? If not, what remained the same?

3. Conclusion (15%)

Briefly summarize your thoughts & conclusion to your critique of the articles and Chapter you read. How did these articles and Chapters influence your opinions about Marketing Health and getting ready and prepared for Emergencies?

Evaluation will be based on how clearly you respond to the above, in particular:

a) The clarity with which you critique the articles;

b) The depth, scope, and organization of your paper; and,

c) Your conclusions, including a description of the impact of these articles and Chapters on any Health Care Setting Organization and planning.

[Order Now]

Buy Management Of Health Care Organizations

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.