Order Number |
636738393092 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
Format |
APA |
Academic Sources |
10 |
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
Buy Human Resourece Management Assignment
HRMT 301 Assignment #1
30 Marks (12.5% of final course grade)
Instructions: 1. Submit your responses to the outline / scenario noted below. 2. Prepare a word-processed file of no more than 4 pages double spaced, with a font
size of no more than 14 and no less than 12. 3. Papers of more than 4 pages double-spaced will be penalized; footnotes/endnotes must
be part of the 4 pages. 4. Please include a cover page, and note your name and student ID # (this page will not be
included as part of your overall page count). 5. Please submit a printed paper copy of your assignment to your professor at the
beginning of class on____________. Late papers will be penalized 5% per day unless extenuating circumstances prevail as per the School of Business Assignment Policy.
6. To assist you in preparing your paper please review Chapter 2 in your text, as well as
the supporting chapter’s Powerpoint slides. I also encourage you to visit the Ontario Human Rights web site at http://www.ohrc.on.ca and/or The Ontario Ministry of Labour web site at: http://www.labour.gov.on.ca/english/ for assistance too.
http://www.ohrc.on.ca/
http://www.labour.gov.on.ca/english/
Outline: Purpose: Evaluate each student’s critical thinking and research capabilities as it relates to the key learning’s from Chapter 2. Situation A: A hiring manager comes to you with a list of questions that she would like to use for her interview to select a customer service representative. Your task is to identify which questions are appropriate and/or inappropriate to ask based on employment legislation. Please provide the manager with a rationale to support each decision you recommend.
Questions: 1. You have a number of extra-curricular activities listed on your resume. Are
there any associations to which you belong? (2 marks) 2. Tell me about a time you were faced with a tight deadline that you weren’t able
to meet. What was the outcome of that situation? (2 marks)
3. Why did you leave your last position? (2 marks)
4. Are you planning to take any other classes or completing any other certification or designation that will assist you in your career growth? (2 marks)
5. Do you have arrangements made for the care of your child while you are at
work? (2 marks)
6. Have you been convicted of an offense? (2 marks)
7. Can you provide me with an example of a time you disagreed with a decision that your manager made? What happened? (2 marks)
8. So your last name is Branch? Where does that name originate? (2 marks)
9. What year did you graduate high school? (2 marks)
10. Is there anything else about you that you’d like me to know? (2 marks)
Situation B: Your company president tells you not to hire any gay or lesbian employees to work as part of his office staff because it would make him uncomfortable.
Task: What would you do in this situation B? Provide your rationale based on Canadian employment legislation to support your decision. (2 marks) Question: What would your response be to your recruiter and why? (2 marks)
Style & Format: (8 marks)
Clarity of communication; clear and concise, free of errors in spelling/grammar: (4 marks)
A minimum of two footnotes or endnotes provided. If words are not your own, then cite them appropriately. (4 marks)
RUBRIC | |||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/