Buy Data Communications And Network

January 2, 2023

Buy Data Communications And Network

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Buy Data Communications And Network

ICT106: Assessment 3 Shaleeza Sohail Nov2018

T3 2018: ICT106 Data Communications and Networks

Assessment 3

Topic: Network Design Report and Presentation

Submission: Report must be submitted on Moodle by Sunday 3 rd

Feb 2019 11:55 pm Presentation in Lecture and Tutorial classes on 4

th Feb 2019

Assignment Details:

Top Network Company (TNC) in Sydney CBD occupies a three-floor building. The company has three

main departments: Administration, Marketing and Sales. Administration is on the ground floor,

Marketing is on the first floor and Sales is on the second floor. Administration has X workstations,

Marketing has X*2 workstations and Sales has X*3 workstations. Generally, each department has its

own applications but some applications require inter-department data transfer. All workstations

need Internet access, company intranet access, access to local servers and access to email. Web and

Email servers are hosted on the ground floor as well. You as a network engineer need to come up

with network design report for TNC.

X = last two digits of your student ID. If X is 00 to 09 then please use X + 10. (For example: if your student ID is 12345678 then use 78 as X but if your student ID is 12345601 then use 01+10=11 as X).

Report: The report must contain the following sections:

1. Introduction: A brief introduction of the requirements of the network

2. Local Area Network (LAN): Design and description of the Local Area Network for all

departments which must include:

a. LAN design showing all workstations, interconnecting devices and connections.

Also, show connections to the server and connection to the Internet.

b. LAN topology and protocol.

3. Hardware: Provide a complete description of all interconnecting devices (switches, routers,

hubs) and wiring used to build the network. Provide justification for your choice.

4. Conclusion: Comprehensive summary of the work done.

Presentation: A five-minute presentation on the main contributions of the report is to be given in

Week 12 lecture and tutorial time. The presentation will be assessed on the following criteria:

 Visual Appeal

 Comprehension

 Presentation skills

 Content

Details about marking can be checked by assessing the subject outline.

[Order Now]

Buy Data Communications And Network

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.