Buy Contemporary Business Law Assignment 1

December 27, 2022

Buy Contemporary Business Law Assignment

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

[Order Now]

Buy Contemporary Business Law Assignment

Case #1: Smith vs. Jones

Mary Smith was the records custodian at ABC Security, Inc. About four times a week Gene Jones, the vice-president of operations for ABC, complimented Smith on her appearance. Onone occasion, he measured the length of her skirt to judge its compliance with the

company’s dress code and then told her that she looked “really good.” In addition to regularly telling Smith how attractive he found her, Jones made references to his physical fitness to indicate he was an attractive person desired by females. He repeatedly remarked to Smith

that if he had a wife as beautiful as Smith, he would not permit her to work around so many men. Jones also had a security camera installed in Smith’s office in a way that permitted him to observe her as she worked. Smith reported this behavior to her immediate supervisor, who simply responded, “Boys will be boys.”

1. Analyze whether Jones’ actions constituted legally actionable sexual harassment of Smith.
2. Analyze what ethical obligations, regardless of whether Jones violated the law, did Smith’s supervisor have to protect her from Jones’ behavior. What is the business lesson to be learned?

3. Analyze whether Smith has any actionable tort claims, besides sexual harassment, and what they may be and against whom.

Buy Contemporary Business Law Assignment

Case #2: Happy Produce, Inc. v. Henry

Bonnie Miller hired Andy Henry to sell organic produce for her company Happy Produce, Inc. Four months later Miller, as the manager of Happy, promoted Henry to sales manager. Soon after, he signed a non-compete agreement in which he agreed “not to directly or indirectly

compete with the business … for two years following termination of employment.” Later, Happy Produce, Inc. encountered financial difficulties, and Henry left to go into business with another former employee to compete against Happy Produce, Inc. in the sale of produce in

the same part of the state. Happy sued to enforce the non-compete agreement. Henry argues that the non-compete agreement is invalid and unenforceable because the contract lacks validconsideration. Happy contends that Henry’s salary and continued employment

supplied sufficient consideration.

1. Analyze whether Happy Produce, Inc. has a valid breach of contract claim against Henry.
2. Assuming that Happy Produce, Inc.’s claim against Henryis invalid for lack of consideration, analyze how the company acting through its agent, Miller, might have obtained a noncompete agreement from Henry that would have been enforceable. What is the business

lesson to be learned?

Case #3: Great Homes Group v. Best Advertising, Inc.

Great Homes Group contracted with Best Advertising to run advertisements in the Miami Herald newspaper. The contract required Great Homes to designate the size of each ad and stated that Best Advertising would print them and “bill for the exact space published.” The

agreement also permitted Best to “revise, alter, or reject any advertisement for any reason, but no change in advertising copy will be made without the customer’s prior consent.” After three years, Great Homes Group brought suit against Best for breach of contract, because

the printed ads were 10% smaller than the copy Great had submitted.

1. Analyze whether Great Homes Group has a valid claim for breach of contract or whether Best Advertising, Inc. substantially performed.

2. Assume that Best Advertising, when it submitted the ads, was told by the Miami Herald newspaper that the documentation was too large for publication and would need to be reduced by 10% to fit the page. What should Best have done at this time? Why? What is the business lesson to be learned?

Case #4: Davis v. TBC

David Davis and a group of friends regularly participated in the extreme sport of “lake jumping,” in which the goal is to ride one’s bike off a jump into a lake. Davis had done lake jumping 25–30 times and even maintained a webpage showing videos of himself and his friends

engaging in the activity. In 2015, Davis bought a used TBC “Off Road” bike over the internet from Jay Ball, who was the bike’s original purchaser. TBC is a well-known bike manufacturer that advertises its products as intended for “extreme” sports. At the time of Davis’

purchase, the TBC bike was almost brand new and included all the original tags, manuals, and warning stickers. Both the bike’s manual and tags contained the following: “Avoid jumping. Bicycles are not made for jumping. Doing so may cause your [bike] frame to fail.” Despite

these warnings, the bike was used regularly and continually for the next three years by Davis and his friends for their “lake jumping” exploits. In 2018, Davis’ friend Mike Miller was severely and permanently injured when the bike’s frame broke as a result of a lake jump.

1. Analyze TBC’s liability for Miller’s injuries, if any. What is the business lesson to be learned?
2. Analyze Davis’ liability for Miller’s injuries, if any.
3. Analyze Ball’s liability for Miller’s injuries, if any.

[Order Now]

Buy Contemporary Business Law Assignment

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.