Buy Comparing Tactical And Strategic Decisions

January 3, 2023

Buy Comparing Tactical And Strategic Decisions

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Buy Comparing Tactical And Strategic Decisions

The Requirements for this assignment:

Must be in APA format
Must have in-text citations which also match all sources listed in reference list (which must be complete and in other words a source in the reference list must be cited in the paper and if there is an in-text citation, the source of that citation must be in the reference list)
In-text citations and reference list must be in APA format
Must be plagiarism free
Must answer all questions completely
Any source used to help answer the questions must be cited within the work and listed in reference regardless if paraphrased in own words
Need back within 48 hours.
No word or page requirement but suggest about 600-800 words

Comparing Tactical and Strategic Decisions

During this simulation, you have been making tactical and strategic decisions. Keeping these in mind, address the following questions:

What are the differences and similarities between the tactical and strategic decisions you have made?
How often did you need to change your strategic decisions? How often did you change your tactical decisions?
What dangers does a company face if it focuses only on tactical decisions?
Also, review the overall process by which your team worked together over the course of the simulation and answer the following questions:

How did your decision-making process evolve over the sequence of decisions?
Why did you make the changes that you did in the decision-making process, or why did you not change?
Did your decision-making process result in better decisions as the simulation progressed, and why do you think it did or did not?

Buy Comparing Tactical And Strategic Decisions

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.