Buy CJUS 801 Program Impact Paper Instructions

December 27, 2022

Buy CJUS 801 Program Impact Paper Instructions

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

[Order Now]

Buy CJUS 801 Program Impact Paper Instructions

Program Impact Paper Instructions
This assignment requires you to write a 20-page Program Impact Paper. The paper combines the previous 4 papers to give the reader an overall understanding of a problem occurring within a criminal justice agency. You will explain the problem occurring, outline an anticrime/prevention intervention, describe the implementation process for the intervention, discuss the strengths and weakness of the approach and outline the statistical analysis that will be used to determine if the intervention will be successful. The paper requires an abstract with a clear thesis with major points that are empirically supported. The paper also requires a Christian worldview to be embedded throughout. The paper will cover the following:

a. Define and discuss the specific problem facing the police department using data to demonstrate your hypothesis that it is in fact a problem. Incorporate an evaluability assessment into this section.

b. Outline the anticrime/prevention program that will be implemented using empirical literature to show that the program is evidence-based or minimally it must be evidence-supported.

c. Outline a process evaluation explaining who will be in charge of what aspects of the program evaluation, implementation and analysis. The management plan already discussed in the management plan paper can be used in this section. Discuss what potential political dynamics can occur within an organization due to the implementation. Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the implementation process chosen.

d. Define the anticrime/prevention program. What data will be gathered to determine success and what statistical analysis will be performed to evaluate the program?

e. Synthesize your anticrime/prevention program selection, implementation, and evaluation with a biblical worldview through the paper.

Assignment specifics:

· The paper will be 20 double-spaced pages of content, not counting the title page, abstract or references, in 12 point Times New Roman.

· The paper requires 20 scholarly citations in current APA format.

· Sections of previous papers can be incorporated into this final paper, no more than 1-page total from each paper.

· A separate title and reference page is required.

[Order Now]

Buy CJUS 801 Program Impact Paper Instructions

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.