Business Law the United States Versus O Hagan

Business Law the United States Versus O Hagan

Instructions/Descriptions

Business Law the United States Versus O Hagan

read the cases, choose 1 of the 4 cases and write up

Your write-up should be at least one page, single-spaced, at standard type face (12 point).

It should briefly (in very few sentences) lay out the basic facts of the case. These are usually generally agreed upon by the time it gets to the final appeal stage; i.e., the Supreme Court or a Federal District court.

What is much more important is the issue at law – the dispute about what the law means or how it should be interpreted.

What was the majority of the court’s decision in the case, and – more importantly – what was the basic reasoning behind this decision?

If you are asked to read a dissent in the case, what was the decision and reasoning in the minority?

Do you agree or disagree with the court’s decision? Explain why.

To avoid even the appearance of plagiarism, references should be clearly connected to the text through parentheses (Smith, 2016) or footnotes. It is not enough to put your references at the end of the paper, with no way to see what text connects with each reference.

Direct quotes should be in quotation marks or, if more than one sentence, in an indented paragraph. Material which is a close paraphrase of another work, although not a direct quote, should be referenced and explicitly acknowledged with the expressions like ‘paraphrase,’ ‘in other words,’ ‘to put it another way,’ or something similar.[Order Now]

Ravi An Independent Contractor Case Study

CASE B—BACKGROUND:

Harpreet, the owner of a new studio called Pottery Palace, verbally offered Ravi a full-time contract. Harpreet planned to manage the business affairs of the studio, while employing two workers: Sam, who answered the telephone and sold pottery in the shop, and Ravi, who would work in the studio behind the shop, designing and making all of the pottery that would be sold in the shop. Ravi would use the kiln, clay, dyes, and other tools provided by Harpreet, working at the studio every day from 8:30 am-4:30 pm, according to the schedule Harpreet provided him.

Ravi worked for five weeks without receiving any pay. One day he asked Harpreet when she would pay him. She paused for a moment, and said, “Give me a moment.” Ten minutes later, she gave Ravi a cheque with a typed pay stub showing the gross pay, but no deductions for Income Tax, Employment Insurance, or Canada Pension Plan contributions. He asked Harpreet about this, and she stated that this was because Ravi was a contractor, and not an employee. Ravi was surprised as he had been under the impression since hiring that he was an employee.

Ravi decides to consult you, an employment lawyer, to see whether he is an employee or an independent contractor, and what rights he has under the law.

CASE B—QUESTIONS:[Order Now]

According to the law, is Ravi an independent contractor or an employee? Explain by applying both the Four-Part Test and the Organization Test, as described in Employment Law Video Lecture Video Lecture pt. 1.

Is Pottery Palace required to follow the Employment Standards Act (ESA) when paying Ravi? Explain whether Pottery Palace has broken any laws regarding paying Ravi on time.

Is Pottery Palace required by law to deduct Ravi’s Income Tax, Employment Insurance, and Canada Pension Plan contributions from his paysheet? Why or why not?

Explain your answers to the questions above using the information from Working in BC (a guide to the ESA) and Employment Law Video Lecture Video Lectures pt. 1 & 2.

Business Law the United States Versus O Hagan

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!