Business Continuity Planning & Disaster Recovery

December 29, 2022

Business Continuity Planning & Disaster Recovery

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Business Continuity Planning & Disaster Recovery

Course: Business Continuity Planning & Disaster Recovery Planning

Due Date – 3 days

“Week Discussion – Work Area and Pandemic Recovery Plans”

Post: Compose and submit well-written paragraphs that contain a minimum of 200 words, which address the following:

Work Area Recovery Plan is a vital plan that establishes an adequate environment for people to work in the event of a disruptive incident. Discuss the challenges that organizations without proper Work Area Recovery Plan may face when disruptive events arise.

What are the benefits of performing Pandemic risk assessment in an organization?

The post should include adequate citations and references that adhere strictly to the APA format.

Reading – Chapters nine and ten of the following text: Wallace, M., & Webber, L. (2018). The disaster recovery handbook: a step-by-step plan to ensure business continuity and protect vital operations, facilities, and assets. New York, NY: AMACOM. ISBN-13: 978-0814438763

“APA Format”

The recommended standard writing style for the school, and this course is the American Psychological Association (APA) format. Refer to the following link for more information on how to use of APA style: https://ucumberlands.app.box.com/v/apa-style-guide

Other resources include the School Library and the Purdue OWL APA resource, available in the following link: https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/general_format.html

“NO PLAGIARISM”

Plagiarism includes copying and pasting material from the internet into assignments without properly citing the source of the material.

Academic Integrity:

At a Christian liberal arts university committed to the pursuit of truth and understanding, any act of academic dishonesty is especially distressing and cannot be tolerated. In general, academic dishonesty involves the abuse and misuse of information or people to gain an undeserved academic advantage or evaluation. The common forms of academic dishonesty include:

Cheating – using deception in the taking of tests or the preparation of written work, using unauthorized materials, copying another person’s work with or without consent, or assisting another in such activities.
Lying – falsifying, fabricating, or forging information in either written, spoken, or video presentations.
Plagiarism — Using the published writings, data, interpretations, or ideas of another without proper documentation.
Episodes of academic dishonesty are reported to the Vice President for Academic Affairs. The potential penalty for academic dishonesty includes a failing grade on a particular assignment, a failing grade for the entire course, or charges against the student with the appropriate disciplinary body.

Business Continuity Planning & Disaster Recovery

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.