Business and Finance Course Paper

December 10, 2022

Business and Finance Course Paper

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

[Order Now]

Business and Finance Course Paper

If I was manufacture fertility drugs, I would facilitate data because of the release of the study results. This is a radical change in a satisfactory direction to promote responsibility, which is helpful for the creation of the product and cultural values. I believe that patients should be known once the study is complete since the patients are very grateful for the information even if a study is undesirable or not (Rizzuto et al., 2019).

Fertility drugs may precisely intensify the danger of borderline ovarian cancer. The fertility drugs encourage growth in prevailing indolent tumors. For instance, gonadotropins, HCG, progesterone, FSH, and LH, have been known as growth factors in ovarian cancer which consequently increases the chances.

Fertility drugs, therefore, relate to an upsurge in ovarian cancer hazard because they can lead to a gain in LH and FSH levels, and rouse ovulation (Reigstad et al., 2017). Moreover, women who continue to be childless have less threat than women conceiving after fertility treatment when they use fertility drugs.

In making this decision two basic ethical principles are involved. Firstly, is the ancient Hippocratic Oath. It entails ensuring ensure what is best for the patient. Secondly is the current idea of patient autonomy which entails the right of the patient to have complete regulation over everything done on her body.

One interpretation of the second code into applied decision making should be exemplified in the perception of informed consensus, a medico lawful term for an agreement by which a patient admits that she has been informed as to the type and the risks of any potential fertility treatment and gives accord to that treatment.

Written consent is presently used almost completely for research studies or hostile procedures. Approval by a patient for fertility treatment, though, suggests conversant consent (Rizzuto et al., 2019). To sum up, further studies is necessary to come up with clear evidence on the effect of fertility drugs and ovarian cancer among the females. Evaluating ovarian cancer risk in women continuing to be childless afterwards, and threats related with increasing doses of fertility drugs is significant.

Reply 2 Jagadesh Achanta

In recent years the relationship between productive strategies, infertility, and the risk of getting gynecological cancer have for years arouse interest. Several side effects have recently been associated with the treatment of infertility that includes the development of cancer (Federica 2014).

Despite the high risk of exposing women to ovarian cancer by consumption of fertility drug manufacturers continue to produce these harmful drugs. This paper addresses the issue of why it is important for drug manufactures to voluntarily disclose information on the adverse effects of fertility drug consumers.

According to the study that was conducted by Stanford University medical research team on the correlation between the use of fertility drugs and ovarian cancer, they concluded that Pergonal and Serophene drugs may increase the risk of getting ovarian cancer by three-times. As such, manufactures need to inform consumers about the effects of drugs. This is because it enables consumers to make an informed decision on whether to consume the drug or not. It does not matter if the consumer may or may not get adverse effects depending on their body.

The effect and the cost of treating cancer are more compared to the price of the drug (Federica 2014). Additionally, consumers are interested in having good health and it’s not a must that one controls infertility using these two drugs which can have a negative side effect of risking an individual to cancer.

When a manufacturer informs a consumer on the side effects of consuming their drugs and the drugs affect them, consumers should not blame the drug manufacturer because they were informed about the side effects they may face (Roberta 2012). Consumers would feel neglected by the government because of allowing manufacturers to produce commodities that have an adverse effect on their bodies and they are aware of it.

As such, some would go to courts to seek compensation from the manufacture for producing harmful commodities for their customers. To avoid such risks and losses it is thus very important for manufacturers to inform consumers about the side effects of drugs so that they can make an informed decision about consuming them.

Professional Plagiarism Free Paper in APA/MLA/Harvard/Turabian Format, Instant Delivery, High Quality Submissions, 100% Unique, Turnitin Report Attached

Business and Finance Course Paper

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.