BUSI 701 Functional Area Research Assignment

December 16, 2022

BUSI 701 Functional Area Research Assignment

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

BUSI 701 Functional Area Research Assignment

BUSI 701, Functional, Area, Research, Assignment

For this paper, you are going to expand on one of the discussion forums that you have already written. You will choose one of the topics from your previous discussions (Marketing, Accounting, Finance, or Management) and elaborate on the current trend in this area.

Your paper should include an introduction of the topic that includes a historical definition based on literature, a discussion of the current research in the field (last 5 years only), and a section that addresses future questions that will need to be addressed and/or explored in research.

This paper should draw on a minimum of ten substantial journal article resources and will be 10 to 12 pages in length (not including the title page, abstract, or reference pages) observing all APA style conventions.

You may use any articles or writings that you wrote about in your previous discussion forums in this course.

The organization of your paper should be as follows:

Title Page

Introduction: Gives an overview of your topic and discusses the organization of your paper. You would also include your historical definition here based on the literature.

Current Research: In this section, you will include identified themes you have found in the research articles that you reviewed. You will support each of these themes with your research articles (See Functional Paper Video in Module 5: Week 5 for more information).

Future Questions: In this section, you will discuss the future research areas that were present in the articles you synthesized. You should list and discuss the question and use multiple articles to provide support. These should come directly from the research (See Functional Paper Video in Module 5: Week 5 for more information.

Criteria Ratings Points

Content 41 to >36.0 pts

Advanced

The paper includes a historical and supported definition of the topic, discussion of current research in the field, and addresses future research questions that need exploration.

36 to >28.0 pts

Proficient

Most of the required components are included but some are not well developed or fully discussed.

28 to >0.0 pts

Developing

Significant number of topics not well covered.

0 pts

Not Present

41 pts

Support 41 to >36.0 pts

Advanced

Strong support for content provided using doctoral level analysis.

36 to >28.0 pts

Proficient

Significant support for content provided.

28 to >0.0 pts

Developing

Weak to fair support for content provided.

0 pts

Not Present

41 pts

Scholarly Sources

41 to >36.0 pts

Advanced

Exceptional number of scholarly sources used above the minimum requirements.

36 to >28.0 pts

Proficient

Adequate number of scholarly sources used meeting minimum requirements.

28 to >0.0 pts

Developing

Insufficient to fair number of scholarly sources used.

0 pts

Not Present

41 pts

APA Formatting

32 to >28.0 pts

Advanced

The paper adheres to current APA format without errors or 1 minimal error. It includes a title page, abstract, citations, reference page, and the use of APA level headings.

28 to >21.0 pts

Proficient

1 or more of the following criteria are not met: The paper adheres to current APA format without errors or 1 minimal error. It includes a title page, abstract, citations, reference page, and the use of APA level headings.

21 to >0.0 pts

Developing

2 or more of the following criteria are not met: The paper adheres to current APA format without errors or 1 minimal error. It includes a title page, abstract, citations, reference page, and the use of APA level headings.

0 pts

Not Present

32 pts

Spelling and Grammar

20 to >18.0 pts

Advanced

Few to no spelling/grammatical errors.

18 to >15.0 pts

Proficient

Modest number of spelling/grammatical errors.

15 to >0.0 pts

Developing

Significant number of spelling/grammatical errors.

0 pts

Not Present

20 pts

Total Points: 175

Functional Area Paper Grading Rubric | BUSI701_B12_202140

[Order Now]

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.