Order Number |
636738393092 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
Format |
APA |
Academic Sources |
10 |
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
Hi this writing is for sociology class(sociology of climate change) the idea of this writing to watch two documentary films that are mentioned below on the instruction given by the instructor and write 1 single spaced pages for each of the documentary you choose to watch that are listed below which you should answer the 5 questions below for each video.
Note: two separate pages for each documentary and label them with their film title, 1 single spaced pages for each which is 2 pages total no morethan the 1 single spaced pages for each.
Instructions by the instructor
Climate Change Documentary Film Review Criteria
You are required to view and analyze two (2) documentary films that directly address the topic of climate change. There are a growing number of climate change films readily available, and can be easily accessed and viewed on-line. Google the topic: you’ll find a rich array of films to select from; including:
An Inconvenient Sequel,
Chasing Ice,
Before the Flood,
Cowspiracy,
Climate Refugee,
The Race is On; Carbon Nation,
Chasing Coral; Everything’s Cool
, to list but a few. Each review should be one full page, single-spaced. For each of the two films reviewed, please address the following questions.
What facet of global climate change was highlighted in this film?
How did the filmmakers “visually approach” the topic?
What were three “factual take-aways” from this film?
What simple or complex “cause and effect” connections were highlighted? Give an example.
What solutions or alternative courses of social action were offered by the filmmaker?
RUBRIC | |||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/