BOP.POL223.CA Descriptions Show Feedback

BOP.POL223.CA Descriptions Show Feedback

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

BOP.POL223.CA Descriptions Show Feedback

[Order Now]

Rubric Detail

A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item

and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.

Show Descriptions Show Feedback

Name: BOP.POL223.CA

Exit

Grid View List View

Writing is style is in academic and uses the 3rd person voice. Paragraphs contain topic thesis and

supporting examples. No spelling errors. Adheres to APA grammar and punctuation guidelines.

Formatted in APA style: in-text citations, pagination, format and reference list. Double spaced with

1 inch margins and page numbers. Essay has a title page, running head title, titles and subtitles in

the body of the text. Documentation clearly cites all source materials within the text of the paper

and in the reference list. Citations in the text, match the reference list. Paper is 8 to 10 pages long

(excluding title and reference pages).

Writing is style is in academic and uses the 3rd person voice. Paragraphs contain topic thesis and

supporting examples. Minimal spelling errors. Minimal errors in grammar, and punctuation.

Mostly formatted in APA style: in-text citations, pagination, format and reference list. Double

spaced with 1 inch margins and page numbers. Essay has a title page, running head title, titles

and subtitles in the body of the text. Documentation cites all source materials within the text of

the paper and in the reference list. Citations in the text, match the reference list. Paper is less

than 8 pages in length (excluding title and reference pages).

Writing is style is informal and does not always use the 3rd person voice. Paragraphs are

developing a topic and supporting sentences. Some spelling errors. Some errors in grammar, and

punctuation. Formatted in a writing style that Is not APA: in-text citations, pagination, format and

reference list. Double spaced with 1 inch margins and page numbers. Essay has a title page, but

missing either running head title or subtitles in the body of the text. Documentation cites some of

the source materials within the text of the paper that are listed in the reference list. Citations in

the text, are on the reference list. Paper is less than 8 pages in length (excluding title and

reference pages).

Writing is style is informal and needs proof reading. Paragraphs do not have a clear topic and

supporting sentences. Multiple errors in spelling, grammar, or punctuation. Inconsistent

formatting writing style of: in-text citations pagination format and reference list Double spaced

Grading Dimension 1: Writing Style

—

Exemplary 90.00 to 100% 22.5 (9.00%) – 25 (10.00%)

Accomplished 80.00 to 89.00% 20 (8.00%) – 22.25 (8.90%)

Developing 70.00 to 79.00% 17.5 (7.00%) – 19.75 (7.90%)

Beginning 60.00 to 69.00% 15 (6.00%) – 17.25 (6.90%)

formatting writing style of: in-text citations, pagination, format and reference list. Double spaced

with 1 inch margins and page numbers. Essay has a title page, but missing either running head

title or subtitles in the body of the text. Paper is less than 5 pages in length (excluding the title

and reference pages).

[Order Now]

Requirements unmet

Unsatisfactory 0.00 to 59.00% 0 (0.00%) – 14.75 (5.90%)

The paper articulates a mature understanding of state and local governments, ethical

considerations and the contribution of a Christian worldview to shape civic responsibilities

Christian values are integrated in one or more sections of the paper.

The paper articulates minimally demonstrates an of state and local governments, ethical

considerations and the contribution of a Christian worldview to shape civic responsibilities

Christian values are integrated in at least one section of the paper.

The paper articulates demonstrates some understanding of state and local governments, ethical

considerations and the contribution of a Christian worldview to shape civic responsibilities

Christian values are integrated in at least one section of the paper.

The paper fails to demonstrate understanding of state and local governments, ethical

considerations and the contribution of a Christian worldview to shape civic responsibilities.

Requirements unmet

Grading Dimension 2: Synthesis of Christian World View

—

Exemplary 90.00 to 100% 22.5 (9.00%) – 25 (10.00%)

Accomplished 80.00 to 89.00% 20 (8.00%) – 22.25 (8.90%)

Developing 70.00 to 79.00% 17.5 (7.00%) – 19.75 (7.90%)

Beginning 60.00 to 69.00% 15 (6.00%) – 17.25 (6.90%)

Unsatisfactory 0.00 to 59.00% 0 (0.00%) – 14.75 (5.90%)

Student submitted semi-final draft through Safe-Assign and attached the Originality Report to the

Final Draft of the Paper. Research is thorough and sound, incorporating at least 10 sources, of

which at least 5 are peer-review journal articles or scholarly books. All web sites utilized are

authoritative. Documentation credits all source materials within the text of the paper and in the

reference list. Citations in the text, are on the reference list.

Student submitted semi-final draft through Safe-Assign and attached the Originality Report to the

Final Draft of the Paper. Research is thorough and sound, incorporating at least 10 sources, of

which at least 2 are peer-review journal articles or scholarly books. All web sites utilized are

authoritative. Documentation credits all source materials within the text of the paper and in the

reference list. Citations in the text, are on the reference list.

Student submitted semi-final draft through Safe-Assign and attached the Originality Report to the

Final Draft of the Paper. Research is partially evident from fewer than 10 sources or fewer than 2

of the sources are peer-review journal articles or scholarly books Some web sites utilized lack

Grading Dimension 3: Evidence of Research and Documentation

—

Exemplary 90.00 to 100% 45 (18.00%) – 50 (20.00%)

Accomplished 80.00 to 89.00% 40 (16.00%) – 44.5 (17.80%)

Developing 70.00 to 79.00% 35 (14.00%) – 39.5 (15.80%)

of the sources are peer-review journal articles or scholarly books. Some web sites utilized lack

credibility. Cites some sources and materials within the text of the paper but not on the reference

list (or visa-versa).

Student failed to submit semi-final draft through Safe-Assign and attach the Originality Report to

the Final Draft of the Paper. Research utilizes fewer than 10 sources and none of the sources are

peer-review journal articles or scholarly books. Many web sites utilized are lacking credibility.

Cites some sources and materials within the text of the paper but not on the reference list (or

visa-versa).

[Order Now]

Requirements unmet

Beginning 60.00 to 69.00% 30 (12.00%) – 34.5 (13.80%)

Unsatisfactory 0.00 to 59.00% 0 (0.00%) – 29.5 (11.80%)

The Selected County’s Pandemic Response vs those of the State of California and the Federal

Government are clearly examined in the introduction of the paper. The California policy problem

and policy domain are identified in the body of the paper. The policy problem and policy domain

are mentioned in the body of the paper. The policy problem and policy domain are not clearly

identified throughout the paper. There is a substantial 125 analysis of responses of the local/state

and federal pandemic response which compares and contrasts policy problems and

consequences of action or in-action. Ethical considerations are made when appraising the

consequences of action or in-action. Current policies or programs are appraised and evaluated in

the paper. Coronavirus Statistics were fully addressed at the local/state and federal levels and

there was a comparison of counties and states to those of similar size. (continued)

The California policy problem and policy domain are identified in the body of the paper. Ethical

considerations are appraised. Current policies or programs are examined. Coronavirus Statistics

were generally at the local/state and federal levels and there was a comparison of counties and

states to those of similar size. General Funding and Budgetary Aspects of Pandemic Reponses are

addressed. It was adequate and representative of the citizenry. There were some inclusions of

public comments for and against responses at all levels. (continued)

The policy problem and policy domain are mentioned in the body of the paper. The is an

identification of responses of the local/state and federal pandemic response which and only

general compares and contrasts policy problems and consequences of action or in-action. Ethical

considerations are made. Current policies or programs are identified. Coronavirus Statistics were

generally addressed at the local/state and federal levels and general comparisons were made.

The Funding and Budgetary Aspect of Pandemic Reponses were identified. It was not substantive,

effective and representative of the citizenry. Public comments were identified however it did not

substantive. Discusses the results of research; however discussion is superficial and shows no

complete assessment of the role of the Governor, County Supervisors and Federal Government

(continued)

The policy problem and policy domain are not clearly identified throughout the paper. There is a

lack of analysis of responses of the local/state and federal pandemic response which compares

Grading Dimension 4: Pandemic Response, Policy Problem Identification, Ethical

Considerations, Funding and Budgetary Analysis, Assessment and Alternative Policy

Recommendation

—

Exemplary 90.00 to 100% 112.5 (45.00%) – 125 (50.00%)

Accomplished 80.00 to 89.00% 100 (40.00%) – 111.25 (44.50%)

Developing 70.00 to 79.00% 87.5 (35.00%) – 98.75 (39.50%)

Beginning 60.00 to 69.00% 75 (30.00%) – 86.25 (34.50%)

lack of analysis of responses of the local/state and federal pandemic response which compares

and contrasts policy problems and consequences of action or in-action. Ethical considerations are

identified No Current Policies are evaluated Coronavirus Statistics were identified at the

local/state and federal levels and there was a general comparison of counties and states to those

of similar size The Funding and Budgetary Aspect of Pandemic Reponses was not fully addressed.

It was not substantive, effective and representative of the citizenry. There was mention of public

comments however the discussion was not substantive. (continued)

Requirements unmet

Unsatisfactory 0.00 to 59.00% 0 (0.00%) – 73.75 (29.50%)

Presentation states clearly an assessment of the response, statistics, funding and budgetary

issues, policy problems, ethical considerations and policy recommendations Ethical

considerations of civic problems are discussed and ethical alternatives to those problems are

recommended. Christian values are fully integrated in the presentation Presentation contains 5 to

7 slides and is no more than 10 minutes in length Provided thoughtful and through critique of

two students presentations

The paper demonstrates, begins a discussion about, the role of civic responsibility and the unique

contribution of the Christian worldview to the analysis and evaluation of complex policy issues.

Ethical considerations of civic problems are discussed but recommendations were not made.

Christian values are generally integrated in the presentation Presentation contains 5 to 7 slides

and is no more than 10 minutes in length Provided a general critique of two students

presentations

The paper demonstrates, begins a discussion about , the role of civic responsibility and the

unique contribution of the Christian worldview to the analysis and evaluation of complex policy

issues. Ethical considerations of civic problems are discussed but recommendations were not

made. Christian values are identified in the presentation Presentation contains less than 5 and

presentation succinct. Provided critique of less than two students presentations

The paper lacks a synthesis of responses assessment and/ or lacks discussion of the contribution

of the Christian worldview to the analysis and evaluation of complex policy issues. Did not provide

a thoughtful critique of two students presentations

Requirements unmet

Grading Dimension 5: Presentation of findings and Student Critiques

—

Exemplary 90.00 to 100% 22.49996 (8.99998%) – 24.99995 (9.99998%)

Accomplished 80.00 to 89.00% 19.99996 (7.99998%) – 22.24996 (8.89998%)

Developing 70.00 to 79.00% 17.49997 (6.99998%) – 19.74996 (7.89998%)

Beginning 60.00 to 69.00% 14.99997 (5.99998%) – 17.24997 (6.89998%)

Unsatisfactory 0.00 to 59.00% 0 (0.00%) – 14.74997 (5.89998%)

TARGET LEVEL Provides insightful analysis and demonstrates good understanding of the issues

surrounding the chosen policy. At least three entities (government branches and civilian) are

discussed in the Analysis. Demonstrates an understanding of how policy interacts with the

various checks and balance mechanisms embedded in Federalism (federal, state and courts)

Program Outcome Dimension 1: BAPA SLO 3 (L4): Analysis and Integration of Branches in Policy

(POL 213)

—

Exemplary 90.00 to 100% 0.00002 (0.00%) – 0.00003 (0.00001%)

Demonstrates a good understanding of the issues surrounding the chosen policy. Three

government entities are discussed in the Analysis. Demonstrates some understanding of how

policy interacts with the various checks and balance mechanisms embedded in Federalism

(federal, state and courts).

The understanding of the issues surrounding the chosen policy is under development. Less than

three government entities are discussed in the Analysis. Demonstrates an initial understanding of

how policy interacts with the various checks and balance mechanisms embedded in Federalism

(federal, state and courts).

There is a little understanding of the issues surrounding the chosen policy. The chosen

government entities discussed in the Analysis are not made clear. There is a limited

understanding of how policy interacts with the various checks and balance mechanisms

embedded in Federalism (federal, state and courts). Analysis is attempted but shallow in scope.

Not Demonstrated

Accomplished 80.00 to 89.00% 0.00002 (0.00%) – 0.00002 (0.00%)

Developing 70.00 to 79.00% 0.00002 (0.00%) – 0.00002 (0.00%)

Beginning 60.00 to 69.00% 0.00002 (0.00%) – 0.00002 (0.00%)

Unsatisfactory 0.00 to 59.00% 0 (0.00%) – 0.00001 (0.00%)

Analysis and conclusions are informed by a Christian perspective that clearly addresses the

ethical obligations of public leadership.

Analysis and conclusions are informed by a Christian perspective that somewhat addresses the

ethical obligations of public leadership.

TARGET LEVEL Analysis and conclusions are not informed by a Christian perspective and do not

address the ethical obligations of public leadership.

There is no evidence of a Christian perspective, nor is there a suggestion of the ethical values that

should inform public leadership.

[Order Now]

Not Demonstrated

Program Outcome Dimension 1: BAPA SLO 5 (L2): Synthesis of Civic responsibility and Christian

World view (PAD 451)

—

Exemplary 90.00 to 100% 0.00002 (0.00%) – 0.00003 (0.00001%)

Accomplished 80.00 to 89.00% 0.00002 (0.00%) – 0.00002 (0.00%)

Developing 70.00 to 79.00% 0.00002 (0.00%) – 0.00002 (0.00%)

Beginning 60.00 to 69.00% 0.00002 (0.00%) – 0.00002 (0.00%)

Unsatisfactory 0.00 to 59.00% 0 (0.00%) – 0.00001 (0.00%)

Name:BOP.POL223.CA

Exit

BOP.POL223.CA Descriptions Show Feedback

RUBRIC Excellent Quality 95-100%   Introduction 45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. Literature Support 91-84  points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. Methodology 58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. Average Score 50-85% 40-38 points More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. 83-76  points There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. 52-49  points The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. Poor Quality 0-45% 37-1 points The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. 75-1 points There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. 48-1 points There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. BOP.POL223.CA Descriptions Show Feedback Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/

 

BOP.POL223.CA Descriptions Show Feedback

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!