Order Number |
65363737383 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY/DISERTATION |
Writer Level |
PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED |
Format |
APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD |
Academic Sources |
10 -20 |
Page Count |
4-8 PAGES |
BeoWolf the poem and movie
Beowulf Essay Guidelines: All papers for this course should be 3-5 pages long, double-spaced with standard font and margins (use the default font and margins in your MS Word program). No title or headings are required for your paper. Just include your name and student ID number. The minimum length for the paper to pass is three full pages. Beowulf papers must be submitted as MS Word documents on Canvas by 5 pm on Wednesday, Feb. 22. No late or Emailed papers will be accepted without documentation of hospitalization or incarceration. Prompt for Beowulf Essay: Compare the sections of Beowulf discussed in class with the analogous sections of the computer-animated film paired with the three Beowulf lectures available on Canvas. Be sure to mention the following: 1) How the explicit nature of film, which provides graphic visual detail of all events in the story, contrasts with literature, which leaves many details up to the imagination of the reader. 2) How the differences between how Beowulf’s encounter with Grendel’s mother is portrayed in both the poem and the film may be rooted in the different moral expectations of the eras in which these two works were produced. 3) How the differences between how Beowulf’s battle with the dragon is portrayed in both the poem and the film may be rooted in the different cultural expectations (with regards to aging) of the eras in which these two works were produced. This essay will be graded pass/fail. You have only one chance to submit your paper. Neither the Professor nor the IAs will preview your paper before you submit it. You will NOT be able to revise the paper if you fail. If you fail, you lose a full-letter grade for the semester. To pass you must observe the following rules: Papers must be submitted via the “Assignments” tab on Canvas as MS Word documents by 5 pm on Wednesday, Feb. 22. No late or Emailed essays will be accepted without documentation of hospitalization or incarceration. You must address ALL of the issues in the above prompt, incorporating these answers into well-structured paragraphs. The title Beowulf (whether describing the poem or the film) must be italicized (not underlined or putin quotation marks) every time you use it within the body of your essay. If you do not always italicize the title, your paper will fail. Make clear with each reference whether you are describing the poem or the film. The character’s name Beowulf must not be italicized. If you italicize the character’s name, your paper will fail. Quotation Guidelines: In the body of your essay, you must quote directly from the poem Beowulf as it appears in our book on pages 85-127. After each quotation, include a parenthetical citation that includes the line numbers you cite.
RUBRIC | |||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/