Benchmark: Career Self-Assessment & Exploration Assignment

February 22, 2023

Benchmark: Career Self-Assessment & Exploration Assignment

Order Number	65363737383
Type of Project	ESSAY/DISERTATION
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED
Format	APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD
Academic Sources	10 -20
Page Count	4-8 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Benchmark: Career Self-Assessment & Exploration Assignment

The purpose of this assignment is to experience the complexities of the career counseling and planning process and to complete an individual career counseling and planning cycle. This assignment provides an opportunity to administer, score, and interpret career assessment results. This assignment will also provide students with an opportunity to engage in an occupational exploration process using career technology information and resources. This process will introduce students to a process that can assist future clients with their career exploration. INSTRUCTIONS Divide your paper using the headings located in the Benchmark: Career Self-Assessment and Exploration Template (without Roman numerals) and follow these guidelines: · Write a 10-12 page paper (not including title page, abstract, or references) · Include a title page, abstract, and a minimum of 3 sources including the O*Net · Please follow current APA formatting · Your paper may be written in first person. · Save your paper in Microsoft Word format as: Last name_First initial_Career_Self- assessment_ Paper (e.g., Doe_J_ Career_Self-Assessment_ Paper). Part I: Career Self-Assessment For this part of your paper, you will use the results obtained from Steps I-III of the Career Inventory Activity. The Career Inventory Activity Instructions can be found in Module 2 in Canvas. You will use the results of the Decision-Making Factors Survey (Horton, 2009), O*Net Interest Profiler and the Value Sort from The Career Inventory Activity to conceptualize your own career development. Part I will be 4-6 pages. Please cite your sources. Part II: Occupational Exploration After reviewing the results of the Decision-Making Factors Survey, O*NET Interest Profiler and Value Sort, select one potential career that you want to further explore based on your top Holland scores and/or identified values. Please gather information about the career and report that information in this paper. Part II will be approximately 3 pages. Please cite your sources. Part III: Practical Application For this part of your paper, you will respond to a career counseling scenario. Use relevant ethical codes and ethical decision-making models to demonstrate how you will navigate a client who has differing values from your own. Part III will be approximately 3 pages. Please cite your sources. Note: Submit your paper to the course assignment link and to Tevera/LiveText: · If you are a School Counseling student, please submit to LiveText. · If you are a Clinical Mental Health/Professional Counseling student, please submit to Tevera. Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

[Order Now]

Benchmark: Career Self-Assessment & Exploration Assignment

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.