Behavior Experiments Generalist Model Discussion

November 29, 2022

Behavior Experiments Generalist Model Discussion

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Behavior Experiments Generalist Model Discussion

[Order Now]

https://video.search.yahoo.com/yhs/search?fr=yhs-m…

Why do you think some people conform, and others do not? Why do some people watch and do nothing when someone is in trouble and others take action? Think of the theories you have learned in your other classes if you had to apply a theory, which theory would apply to conformity or non-conformity? Also reply to two students that after you send me the answer for this disscusion board i will send you a two classmates posts that you should write a reply for them too as well, and i willl give you and hour extra to write a reply for them 🙂 thank you

Work The Generalist Model Essay

Construct an essay on the generalist model of 750-1,000 words and include the following:

Explain the generalist model.

Discuss why the generalist model became the operational model in social work.

Analyze the advantages and disadvantages to the social worker in using the generalist model.

Be sure to cite at least three relevant scholarly sources in support of your content.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide.

[Order Now]

This assignment is informed by the following EPAS Standards:

1: Demonstrate Ethical and Professional Behavior

2: Engage Diversity and Difference in Practice

3: Advance Human Rights and Social, Economic, and Environmental Justice

Behavior Experiments Generalist Model Discussion

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.