Order Number |
636738393092 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
Format |
APA |
Academic Sources |
10 |
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
BCO224 Financial Markets Course Assignment
BCO224, Financial, Markets, Course, Assignment
Description:
Assignment Launch: Week 10
Submission: Week 14 – Via Moodle (Turnitin). Submission will be accepted all Week 14: From the 11th to the 17th of May at 23:59hrs (Barcelona’s time).
Weight: This task is a 40% of your total grade for this subject.
Outcomes: This task assesses the following learning outcomes:
QUESTIONS
BANK A | |||
Reserves | 120 | Deposits | 850 |
Loans | 900 | Bank Capital | 170 |
Total assets | 1020 | Total Liabilities and Equity | 1020 |
BANK B | |||
Reserves | 120 | Deposits | 1000 |
Loans | 900 | Bank Capital | 20 |
Total assets | 1020 | Total Liabilities and Equity | 1020 |
EXERCISES
Bond A | Bond B | |
Maturity (years) | 20 | 30 |
Annual Coupon rate (%) | 12 | 8 |
Par Value | 100 | 100 |
Stock | Shares owned | price |
A | 500 | $5.74 |
B | 6,000 | $65.10 |
C | 3,000 | $12.04 |
Cash | n.a. | $4,368.40 |
Rubrics
Exceptional 90-100 | Good 80-89 | Fair 70-79 | Marginal fail 60-69 | |
Knowledge & Understanding (20%) | Student demonstrates excellent understanding of key concepts and uses vocabulary in an entirely appropriate manner. | Student demonstrates good understanding of the task and mentions some relevant concepts and demonstrates use of the relevant vocabulary. | Student understands the task and provides minimum theory and/or some use of vocabulary. | Student understands the task and attempts to answer the question but does not mention key concepts or uses minimum amount of relevant vocabulary. |
Calculation
(40%) |
Student demonstrates excellent ability to calculate and understand all key formulas & exercises. | Student demonstrates good ability to calculate and understand all key formulas & exercises. | Student demonstrates fair ability to calculate and understand all key formulas & exercises. | Student demonstrates insufficient ability to calculate and understand all key formulas & exercises. |
Analysis
(30%) |
Student demonstrates an excellent ability to interpret statistics and the calculation results, as well as a highly critic approach | Student demonstrates a good ability to interpret statistics and the calculation results, as well as a good critic approach | Student demonstrates a fair ability to interpret statistics and the calculation results, as well as a fair critic approach | Student demonstrates an insufficient ability to interpret statistics and the calculation results, as well as an insufficient critic approach |
Communication (10%) | Student communicates their ideas extremely clearly and concisely, respecting word count, grammar and spellcheck. | Student communicates their ideas clearly and concisely, respecting word count, grammar and spellcheck. | Student communicates their ideas with some clarity and concision. It may be slightly over or under the wordcount limit. Some misspelling errors may be evident. | Student communicates their ideas in a somewhat unclear and unconcise way. Does not reach or does exceed wordcount excessively and misspelling errors are evident. |
BCO224 Financial Markets Course Assignment
RUBRIC | |||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/