Order Number |
234453092 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
Format |
APA |
Academic Sources |
10 |
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
Course code: BCO216MIS course name: Management of Information Systems Task brief & rubrics
Task
DOE Consulting is an IT Consulting Company, result of the merger of seven little IT consulting companies located in different countries of Europe. With the merger, the resulting company has an annual revenue figure of 65 M€, a staff of 350 people. The activities of the company will be developed throughout three separate locations (Germany, France, and Spain), with the headquarters located in Paris (France).
After the creation of the consolidated company, the recent named Board of Directors have identified as a critical need the definition and implementation of the new Information Systems.
Due to the nature of the business of the company (B2B services), about the 60% of the employees make their work in the facilities of the customer, but they need to connect to the IS of DOE Consulting to introduce, collect, and share data and information with other colleagues. They generate about a 78% of non-structured data, and a 22% of structured data.
Considering the company as a whole, you must identify which Information Systems you recommend to implement, which function will have each of these Information Systems, where will be the data located and in which form, which is the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) of your proposal, and any additional aspect you consider relevant from an IS point of view.
As a final conclusion, your proposal must clarify the value that it brings to the business.
Details of the task
Formalities:
Submission: Week 13 – Via Moodle (Turnitin) – Deadline: Sunday 16/01/2022 23:59 CEST.
Weight: This task is a 65% of your total grade for this subject.
It assesses the following learning outcomes:
processes.
Rubrics
Exceptional 90-100 Good 80-89 Fair 70-79 Marginal fail 60-69 Knowledge &
Understanding (20%)
Student demonstrates excellent understanding of key concepts and uses vocabulary in an entirely appropriate manner.
Student demonstrates good understanding of the task and mentions some relevant concepts and demonstrates use of the relevant vocabulary.
Student understands the task and provides minimum theory and/or some use of vocabulary.
Student understands the task and attempts to answer the question but does not mention key concepts or uses minimum amount of relevant vocabulary.
Application (30%) Student applies fully relevant knowledge from the topics delivered in class.
Student applies mostly relevant knowledge from the topics delivered in class.
Student applies some relevant knowledge from the topics delivered in class. Misunderstanding may be evident.
Student applies little relevant knowledge from the topics delivered in class. Misunderstands are evident.
Critical Thinking (30%)
Student critically assesses in excellent ways, drawing outstanding conclusions from relevant authors.
Student critically assesses in good ways, drawing conclusions from relevant authors and references.
Student provides some insights but stays on the surface of the topic. References may not be relevant.
Student makes little or none critical thinking insights, does not quote appropriate authors, and does not provide valid sources.
Communication (20%)
Student communicates their ideas extremely clearly and concisely, respecting word count, grammar and spellcheck
Student communicates their ideas clearly and concisely, respecting word count, grammar and spellcheck
Student communicates their ideas with some clarity and concision. It may be slightly over or under the wordcount limit. Some misspelling errors may be evident.
Student communicates their ideas in a somewhat unclear and unconcise way. Does not reach or does exceed wordcount excessively and misspelling errors are evident.