Battle on Haifa Street, Baghdad, Iraq

November 24, 2022

Battle on Haifa Street, Baghdad, Iraq

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Battle on Haifa Street, Baghdad, Iraq

[Order Now]

Are you tube a source of journalism?

Is this a legitimate example of journalism? Why or why not

Clip 1: Battle on Haifa Street, Baghdad, Iraq

The Battle of Haifa Street was a battle fought for the control of Haifa Street in January 2007. In the late 2007, Logan filed a report about fighting along Haifa Street in Baghdad. The CBS news refused to run the report on the nightly news because the footage was a bit strong. Logan tried to win the support of the public to counter that decision. Logan said that he would be very grateful if anyone had a chance to watch the story and pass the link on to as many people they knew. He wanted the story to be seen by everyone. Logan went on to use some of the Haifa Street material during a sixty minutes report about life in Baghdad under the surge. This is legitimate journalism. According to the power points a journalist is describe as someone who subjects work to verification, makes a conscious effort to maintain independence and is accountable. The primary mission of journalists is to inform the public by collecting and presenting information according to standards that define journalism.

Clip 2: Fallujah CBS story

It is a report by CBS on the battle for Fallujah. The report stated that an IED detonation was a lucky strike against US military. I think this is a legitimate example of journalism. The journalists gathered enough information for the media outlet that disseminates the information through a broad medium like the newspaper, magazine, television and motion picture. The participating units were the American forces, the Iraqi forces and the British forces. The journalists asserted that the continuous slaughter in Fallujah greatly contributed to escalating violence on other regions of the country. They also revealed that violence prompted by the U.S. invasion resulted in the assassinations of at least 338 Iraqi’s associated with Iraq’s new government. The reporters gave the public more information about the battle participants, proceedings and the casualties. The journalist practiced verification, transparency, acknowledged when they could not verify and acknowledged the mistakes they made during their coverage.

[Order Now]

Clip 3: My Iraq Music Video

This video is in the entertainment category. The goal of entertainment is to amuse or engage people during their leisure period in activities which they are passive participants.

I think this is a legitimate example of journalism because pictures are used to relay the information to the public of what actually happened in Iraq although there is no accountability of the journalist. The information provided is verified by the pictures shown. The journalist does not abide by the code of ethics of the Society of Professional Journalist. That is there is no accountability to the readers, listeners and the viewers. The information given was useful in the end. The video showed the violence that was experienced in Iraq. The video showed how the forces were armed and the equipment used like the tankers and the weapons. The journalist made an effort to maintain independence. This video shows reliable information which is also the truth.

Battle on Haifa Street, Baghdad, Iraq

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.