Barriers to healthcare that non-English speaking Hispanic Patients Experience

January 17, 2023

Barriers to healthcare that non-English speaking Hispanic Patients Experience

Order Number	65363426466355
Type of Project	ESSAY/DISERTATION
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED
Format	APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD
Academic Sources	10 -20
Page Count	4-8 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Barriers to healthcare that non-English speaking Hispanic Patients Experience

7 pages double spaced, 1inch margins. 12 point font Times New Roman. Minimum of 5 citations in AMA format. Paper must include: Abstract: 50-100 word summary of the topic including conclusions. Introduction: Overview of barriers covered in paper. Identify why topic is important, state of current knowledge, clear statement of what will be discussed. Body of review: thorough discussion of barriers, external and internal resources, resources available at local, community, or national level. Clear, detailed logical development of ideas. Conclusion: Summary of reason topic is important, brief recap of key findings. References: minimum 5 references in AMA format that are peer reviewed or government resources. 3 of the references must be within 5 years of current year.

[Order Now]

Barriers to healthcare that non-English speaking Hispanic Patients Experience

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.