AUST COVID from a Social and Medical Viewpoint Paper

November 29, 2022

AUST COVID from a Social and Medical Viewpoint Paper

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

AUST COVID from a Social and Medical Viewpoint Paper

[Order Now]

Assignment: Sociological Application

Part Two

Due: 11:55 pm ET Sunday Week 7

Overview

One of the most important things we can do in this course distinguishes between the sociological viewpoint toward health and illness and strictly clinical or medical viewpoints toward health and illness. For example, we must understand how sociology incorporates issues of race, class, gender, language, and so forth into the analysis of health and illness outcomes in society. This is a continuation of Assignment one. For this Assignment, based on the first Assignment, you will compare and contrast the medical and social viewpoint of COVID-19.

Instructions

Construct a 3 page paper that compares and contrasts the medical and social viewpoints you identified in Assignment one.

Compare and contrast the two viewpoints (medical and social) concerning COVID-19 you identified in Assignment one and discuss how each view impacts mortality. It is a good idea to include not only mortality rates but also sources to validate your arguments.

[Order Now]

Be sure to include and apply at least two social concepts and one social theory learned from the course. Do not apply the same concepts or theories you used for Part One.

Include at least three peer-reviewed journal articles no more than five years old (none that are provided in class) to support your explanation of how the sociological viewpoint applies to this health issue. Do not use the same journal articles you used for Part One.

AUST COVID from a Social and Medical Viewpoint Paper

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.