Assignment 2 Individual Change Paper

February 15, 2023

Assignment 2 Individual Change Paper

Order Number	766353367856374
Type of Project	ESSAY/DISERTATION
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED
Format	APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD
Academic Sources	10 -20
Page Count	4-8 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Assignment 2 Individual Change Paper

Cameron and Green (2020) and our class lecture taught us how we undergo personal change and the psychological process. But how do we make sense of that? Please reflect on your personal experiences. Please reflect on the following: What are some of the transformative (critical) events that happened in your life? What was so difficult or challenging that gave you that special meaning? What went wrong or what could be improved? What changes did you have to make to become the person (leader) you are today? Or given what you know now, how would you manage this change differently today? Link your life’s critical events to the individual change section of this course. Please reflect on the following: Your emotions, the Kubler-Ross Model. The different approaches to change. The different behavioural approaches to change. The cognitive approaches to change. The psychodynamic approaches to change. The humanistic psychology approach to change. Learning and the process of change. Conscious and unconscious competence and incompetence. Kolb’s learning cycle.

Assignment Guideline

Write a minimum three-page paper on two transformative (or critical) events in your life, plus a Cover Page and a Reference Page. You must link your essay to this course’s individual change section (Cameron & Green, Chapter 1) of this course. What happened? Please be concise and to the point. What caused you to change? What were the difficulties or challenges? Why? What were the resulting changes? Important Must be in APA 7 format with the correct use of APA in-text citations for paraphrased ideas and quoted text. You are not to use any external sources. Please only use Cameron and Green (2020) as your reference. Marks will be deducted if other references are used. This assignment is about your individual (personal) change journey, not authentic leadership. There should be at least one citation per page for this assignment.

[Order Now]

Assignment 2 Individual Change Paper

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.